Search
Motoramic

What the end of the Ford Ranger says about working in America

Sometime Friday, the final Ford Ranger pickup will be driven off the assembly line in St. Paul, Minn., ending an 86-year run for a factory opened by Henry Ford. Here's what the end of the Ranger means for work in America.

Launched in 1982, but born from the gas crises of the '70s, the Ranger was for over a decade the most popular small truck in America through 2004. Since then, the numbers have plunged to as low as 55,000 a year, but even in its final year, Ford will likely sell more Rangers in the United States than Mustangs.

Since its last redesign in 1998, Ford has toyed with updating or replacing the Ranger for years — but decided a new model would only compete too closely with the F-Series pickups for a shrinking pool of customers. And where fuel economy had once been the Ranger's reason for existence, technology has caught up; the twin-turbo V-6 F-150 pickup now gets better mileage than the top-end Ranger.

"The compact pickup segment in the U.S. has been declining — from almost 8 percent of total industry sales in 1994 to 2 percent of industry sales in 2010," said Ford spokesman Mike Levine "The F-Series works best for customers in North America."

After the last Ranger departs St. Paul on Friday — en route to use by Orkin, which has bought almost exclusively Ford Rangers for its exterminators — the Twin Cities Assembly plant will close. Built in 1924 by Henry and Edsel Ford, the plant employed 2,000 workers at its peak, riveting together everything from Mercury Turnpike Cruisers to armored cars for World War II. After Friday, some 800 workers will be let go.

But it's also a sign that the rest of America isn't working like it used to. There are as many Americans working in construction today as there were 15 years ago. The same is true for repair and maintenance jobs -- men and women who drive from job to job every day, racking up hundreds of thousands of miles on their Rangers. The people who bought most Ford Rangers for work and home simply don't have jobs that require the ability to haul an 8-foot sheet of plywood; those that still do were steered to the larger pickups that were discounted enough to seal the sale.

That's not true elsewhere. Earlier this year, Ford launched a new Ranger in Asia that will eventually be sold in 188 countries. Larger than the current Ranger but still smaller than an F-150, Ford stuffed the new global Ranger with a host of new tech, from touch-screen navigation to new fuel-efficient diesel engines.

The two countries where it won't be sold: the United States and Canada. In Australia, where the new Ranger has won strong plaudits from reviewers, the base model costs $28,000, more than what a larger, well-equipped F-150 can be bought for here. Top-end models touch $40,000, unheard-of prices for a small pickup on these shores.

Ford's loss has other companies moving; General Motors is expected to bring out a new version of the Chevrolet Colorado, also based on a global update, and Nissan and Toyota remain strong sellers. Whether the Ranger ever goes back to work here depends on when the rest of us do as well.

 
 
Top Locations Surfside Wilkes-Barre St Louis

2,803 comments

  • Alec  •  Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania  •  3 months ago
    I'll sure miss these trucks. I love my little 97 2.3l I enjoy making performance improvements to it. They are built for the average man to work on and always were reliable. Ford needs to fix this. They can't remove the ranger because of a fuel efficiency difference. you know, rangers have such a good reputation I'm sure they'd still sell. http://redranger.no-ip.org/
  • MVPIII  •  Surfside, California  •  3 months ago
    TRULY TOO BAD GREAT TRUCKS. i AGREE FORD NEEDS TO LOWER THEIR PRICES. SINCE THEY RECEIVED NO BAIL OUT ALL THEY HAVE DONE IS JACKED UP ALL PRICES. I LOVE FORD BUT IF THEY DON'T LOWER PRICES I STOP LIKING THEM.
  • Deadman  •  St Louis, Missouri  •  3 months ago
    Hey I don't care as long as they drop the prices on ALL F-150 models because they did force it down our throats but I still have my 2000 ranger and hardly ever had problems with it. And mine only has 87,000 miles on it.
  • Jennifer Nein  •  3 months ago
    this is sad, I've owned my 1995 Ranger for 6 years she's got 300k plus miles and never has let me down. I've driven chevy and dodge but by far Ford Ranger is the best truck I've ever owned. I'll never sell my little truck!
  • lance  •  5 months ago
    wasnt ford the only 1 to not take bail-out monet?
    • Rodney Bissell 5 months ago
      Yeah because they got lucky and financed everything right down to the staplers in the offices.. then the crash hit and they look like heroes!! Once again LUCKY!
    • Clock 5 months ago
      Also because if they HAD taken government money, Henry would have risen from his grave and castrated every single one of them!
    • lance 5 months ago
      ahh,a ford hater.........do you run a billion dollar company?do you have a product in every developed country on our planet?
  • carlosa  •  5 months ago
    sucks i had two rangers
    • davemau8 5 months ago
      So, the first one sucked, and you bought another? Not very sharp, are you?
    • yank92 5 months ago
      Davemau8 I see you never owned one because you are talking thru your butthole. I had a 93 ranger and drove it till 2005. It had over 235,000 miles on it when I sold it. Those 235,000 miles were hard miles as it was driven daily on construction jobs all over the country. As far as I know it's still on the road today.
    • Raffi 5 months ago
      I bought one brand new in 2005 as my first car when I was 17. 6 years later it just rolled over to 70,000 miles and I plan on driving it for another 10 years. Very fun car to drive, very reliable car it has only broken down on my once on the free way that costed 100 dollars to repair. 6 years and only 100 dollars in repairs is a great deal if you ask me.
  • Michael  •  5 months ago
    This is a damn criin' shame, i owned a 2008 Ford Ranger it was my first truck. I hauled a lot of hay and wood in a 6ft bed and got great gas milage from it. Now all these employees lose there jobs and a death of a great small- sized truck. Come off it peaple every time you shut down a plant here in AMERICA you keep peaple off of the sreets begging for money, think of there families.
    • Freddie 5 months ago
      how in the heck can someone thumbs down that! BLOOMIN IDIOTS!
    • Ethan 5 months ago
      It is shutting down because they are losing money. Maybe more Americans should buy them. Your anger is aimed in the wrong direction. Ford should make something that Americans want to buy. The Tacoma is a great seller, because it is aimed to sell, not stay the same 2 door that it started out as. Also, learn to spell, and read your last sentence, it contradicts itself. When you shut down a plant it keeps people on the street, not off.
  • Cheng Yee  •  5 months ago
    Stupid Ford will put out a foreign Version with a Deisel Engine... It would, could, and should be VERY fuel efficient. Just like another car (Clean Deisel ie) they offer in the UK that gets 73mpg. http://www.ford.co.uk/Cars/Fiesta/Models

    Wife drives a VW Deisel TDI Jetta....it gets mid 40's mpg and is very low maintenance. Love it, but I would Gladly BUY an American made Ford version if they would allow it.

    I hate you Ford...You should offer the best stuff to the USA...not abroad.
    • Dr Doom 5 months ago
      Yeah. 73 MPGs and not offer it here in a country with much longer streches of road that needs a vehicle like that.. I always wondered why that is.
    • Cheng Yee 5 months ago
      You said it Dr Doom, I was in UK and Scotland recently and it was depressing seeing Ford Fiesta MID Sized models that can carry 5 people btw...being driven.
    • Cheng Yee 5 months ago
      BUMP
  • John  •  5 months ago
    The title of this article should have been: "End of the Era of American Excellence - Thanks To Barrack Hussien Obama". Do the research folks, Obama is now squeezing our auto companies out of existence by ordering the EPA to dictate MPH standards which are simply not possible to attain with current technology. The Obama administration has directed US auto makes to achieve 35 MPH - for trucks - by next year! Soooo.... lets see....Obama killed the 7 billion $ deal with Taiwan ( causing the elimination of over 20,000 US high tech , hig paying jobs in the US airline industry.......Obama has prevented US oil companies from drilling on US terra firma, ensuring his mulsim pals keep us under their control........Obama has killed the Canadian pipeline that would have lowered the cost of gas at the pumps by 75 cents - within a year, and removed OPEC's strangle hold on the USA...... oh, what is the point.... most of the morons on this site are too brain dead to understand what is happening here.......
    • ZG 5 months ago
      You're a moron. Do you have any facts to back up your claims? It's 35 by 2016, and its an average across all of a manufacturers products. That means if the F-150 is 25 and the Fusion Hybrid is 45, Ford is good.
    • James W 5 months ago
      lol, MPH. You're a smart cookie
    • John 5 months ago
      How can you "lol" with your head so far up your anus? If you could possilby remove it long enough to study, investigate, read, etc... you would not post such ignorant remarks. BTW.... how do you type with your head so far up?..
  • Dan K  •  5 months ago
    Not To worry Ranger fans. Ford will "Re-introduce" the Ford ramger in a couple of years but it will not be built in this country! This is just a way of hidding the moving a plant overseas!
    This endless exoduse of American auto jobs could be stopped if we were not so lazy or cared to looked and see where our car was built and who made the parts!! If we ALL bought "made in America" they would soon move ALL these jobs back home!!! I never understood how foreign automakers make huge profits building cars in America but our "American" manufacturers can't???? They are ALL covered by the same government rules and Regulations. Is it greed??? Or is it a lack of American leadership ability??? What do you think???
  • Capt Bill  •  5 months ago
    Do not buy a product from any company that takes its jobs overseas. They will either come back to the US or go under. Someone else will come along and take their place as has been done down thru the years. The people are sick of this and should not take it anymore. Do something productive, put a politician out of work.
  • Dan  •  5 months ago
    I had a 93 Ranger in High School, great lil truck
  • Andrew Eason  •  5 months ago
    the ford ranger has been around for a lot longer than 1982. I know for a fact you can get certain ford F-100 Rangers built in the 60's and 70's. They had the same body style as the other reg F-series but clearly wore the ranger tag.
  • Daniel  •  5 months ago
    Well....let me tell you as a former Ford Ranger owner. I bought a 2000 Ranger brand new. Was a good little truck. Not much power for a 4 cylinder. But it was tried and true. Over the years that I had the truck, I think there were only a few moderate issues. When it was under warranty I had a problem with the truck stalling out while the a/c was running....turned out to be an oxygen sensor and some other parts. Ummm....oh, I had a problem with the transmission slipping. They adjusted that. Other than that, the rear window started leaking and my alternator went out. Like I said moderate things. Overall, it was a good truck because I took care of it. Sold it to my dad and he knew it was worth it. I've been hoping they would do a complete redesign and maybe merge the Ranger with the Escape platform, make a unibody truck. Guess that dream is over. But it is true as far as value....the mpg are ridiculous. Why would an F-150 get better mileage? And they are overpriced. You probably have those auto unions to blame for that. Sad to see it go........but it is time.
  • johnny  •  5 months ago
    Ford could have experimented with high MPG Rangers, including diesel hybrids and pure electric trucks before putting 800 workers out into the streets, but maybe it was by design to get rid of high-cost workers with pensions. The article does not mention where the new Asian Ranger is being built, but my guess would be just across the border in Mexico, made possible by NAFTA agreements.
  • jake  •  5 months ago
    I'll miss the Rangers. But seeing how they're going overseas, it's not worth buying anymore.
  • tommy  •  5 months ago
    this really is a shame, i only buy American made, which are all ford products. four to be exact. guess it is time to check out the jeeps...
  • King of Pain  •  5 months ago
    I owned a 1988 Ranger 4 banger with a five speed with over 200,000 miles that got 35 miles to the gallon. Sure wish I had that truck back. I see absolutly NO progress in the auto industry except how to charge more for less. I also owned a carborated LT-1 350 Chevy in a 1971 Nova with 3:73 gears that got 21 mpg highway when I kept my foot out of it.
  • david e  •  5 months ago
    I have a 2003 ranger super tk with 45,000 i will keep this tk until the wheels fall off its sad they are stoping production
  • Harold  •  5 months ago
    Why is it in 1981 30 years ago I was able to buy a pickup that got 42mpg and today you only get half that? I had a Datsun (Nissan) extended cab MVP with a diesel engine and 5 speed trans. I got 37mpg in the city and 42mpg on the hiway. I never had any trouble with it and it was very dependable, easy to drive and easy to park. I have searched high and low and you cannot get anything like it anymore. We have gone backwards instead of forward!!!!!!!

Follow Yahoo! Autos

Top Rated

Category: Sedans