Search
Motoramic

Why a millionaire wants autoworkers to take a pay cut

The former head of the Obama administration's auto task force says he should have pushed the United Auto Workers for steeper sacrifices in the General Motors bailout, including wage cuts. The people earning $9 a hour in a suburban Detroit GM plant would disagree.

Former auto czar and wealthy Wall Street financier Steven Rattner told a luncheon in Detroit on Thursday that while the $50 billion GM bailout was successful, "we should have asked the UAW to do a bit more. We did not ask any UAW member to take a cut in their pay." He also said that "friends on Wall Street" were concerned by GM's earnings and communications with the market, pushing the stock down to a level that would lose the goverment $14 billion if it sold its shares today.

Meanwhile, at General Motors' Orion Township, Mich., plant about 45 minutes away from where Rattner spoke, there are three tiers of hourly workers. Roughly 900 workers at the top tier, the most senior UAW workers, make $29 an hour, a rate unchanged since 2008. Another 500 or so UAW workers are paid about $16 an hour — a rate, adjusted for inflation, equal to the famed $5 a day Henry Ford started paying his workers in 1914.

And at the bottom scale are 200-odd workers technically employed by an outside supplier but who work in the plant moving parts to the assembly line, jobs once done by GM workers paid $29 an hour. The contractors' pay: $9 an hour with no health care, a rate which over a year's work would leave them below the poverty level for a family of four.

GM's contract with the UAW that convinced the company to move small-car production to Orion from South Korea allows it to shift such work to the outside supplier. That supplier has resisted UAW bargaining, and the tensions have grown high enough that UAW workers at the plant picketed earlier this month and sought approval from the union for a strike. (They delayed one planned picket so that President Obama could tour the plant with South Korea's president).

GM's North American arm posted operating profits of $5.7 billion in the past nine months, on which it will pay little to no federal income tax thanks to a law passed during the bailout preserving tax credits from the years when it bled money. The estimated savings to GM of its tiered wages at Orion: $112 per vehicle, on Chevy Sonics and Buick Veranos that start at $14,500, and can sell for $29,000. By GM's own stats, $29,000 is also the average annual wage of all GM hourly and salaried workers at Orion.

The UAW wants to move tier two workers up in the coming years, while all three Detroit automakers expect to expand the number of workers being paid the lower wage. Rattner's friends on Wall Street may want GM to cut deeper and answer their whims, but I don't see many of them embracing a life of poverty just to keep their jobs -- despite their far larger bailout.

Photo: Getty, AP

 

11,341 comments

  • Yank in Dallas  •  5 months ago
    How come no one ever talks about cutting the pay of the Congress and Senate? They been been the worst performers for their pay than any union workers. What about the pensions they get that will allow them a retirement more comfortable than most people who work for a living? No one EVER mentions that our government needs a pay cut!!!!
    • Mad Dog 5 months ago
      Everyone on Yahoo postings mentions it. The only ones who never mention
      it is Congress and the Senate themselves. Also not these dummies always
      vote themselves thier own raises to boot..... Ask anyone of those idiots in
      the Congress and Senate and they say they are doing a great job... We got
      to vote them all out and start fresh, None are worth thier pay.
    • j 5 months ago
      they also get drop pensions by retiring and then applying for another government job and then retiring from that too.
    • Yank in Dallas 5 months ago
      @ Mad Dog, if that's true, then I'm probably not reading enough comments. Then the media needs to start mentioning that our government is making too much. Or maybe this should be a prime objective of #OWS
  • tflemoful  •  5 months ago
    Pay cuts should start a the TOP , and including him .
    • Jerry 5 months ago
      exactly
    • Chris 5 months ago
      pay cuts of the top is not acceptable because its considered socialism according to fox news. And apparently, no matter how much the democrats pretend to go after the rich, they agree to that fox news rule at the end of the day and legislate with republicans. So who do you pick? The party that is proud to be for the rich or the party of great actors and actresses?
    • Rebecca 5 months ago
      On the other hand, to quote Phil Gramm, I've never in my life been hired by someone with less money than myself.
  • John  •  5 months ago
    my only question is why the hell doesnt this a hole take a pay cut !
    • the7W8b5X 5 months ago
      It's really unfair for you to propose such a trick question. Who should be able to ask such an unfair question to such a vulnerable person.....who doesn't even bother answering things of such an outrageous nature anyhow?
    • F1FAN 5 months ago
      That a-hole doesn't work for Obama any longer.learn to read!
    • JT 5 months ago
      obamas czars arent gonna take pay cuts...
  • CHARLES  •  5 months ago
    what an a hole, bet he wont take a pay cut...
    • gary 5 months ago
      You have to establish where he works now, did you not see FORMER there?
    • CHARLES 5 months ago
      just the former task force worker which is not around anymore, he still is a financier, working with wall street...
    • CHARLES 5 months ago
      plus, how much you think he made for woking on that for the obama administration, be willing to bet its more than you and myself make in 10 years
  • rickeyrat  •  5 months ago
    Top management should take a big cut. This should trickled down to the bottom employees. Upper management need to take good look at why they make so much. It's the people putting these great American vehicles together. Fix the economic inbalance in our country!!!!!!
    • JoB 5 months ago
      I agree but that will not balance the issue before them but can beb seen as a postive gesture.

      The common mantra of unions againts WalMart is what the CEO makes. If one were to divide his total compensation between all the workers they would receive less than $18 extra in a year. To put that in perspective monthly union dues are double that.. Who really is bleeding who?
    • farmmann 5 months ago
      you liberals make me puke. union greed broke the back of this country not the "managers" did it ever occur to you retards that managers and CEO's get paid more because their smarter that you? sure blame walmart for being one of the naitions largest "employers" you will all die! when they get sick of your liberal crap and close the doors and quit. after all, they are rich enough and dont really need you Bull crap anymore.
    • Susan 5 months ago
      Farmmann, when Reagan took office, the average compensation for the average US CEO was 42 times the wage of the average worker in his/her company. Today the average CEO compensation is 343 times the average worker's wage. This is a direct result of Reagan's "trickle-down" economics (called "vodoo economics by Bush the elder) and the deregulation that followed.

      You say they make more money because "they're smarter than you"? Please tell me ANYTHING that ANYONE can do that justifies annual compensation of $25,000,000. I have no argument against FAIR compensation for the CEO of a company, but puhleeze.
  • popeye1250  •  5 months ago
    These days $15 an hour is "subsistance level" wages.
    Sure, these suits think *they* should make $300 an hour but you're "overpaid" making $40 an hour!
    A$$H0LS!!!
  • stevet  •  5 months ago
    someone should just give him 9.00 an hour to live on less taxes from our tax bracket so he can live on 240.00 dollars a week asshole. he probably made his money from mommy and daddy and never worked a day in is life.
  • kzray2000  •  5 months ago
    ALSO WHY DON'T CAPITAL HILL SLASH THEIR PAY CUZ THEY SURE ARN'T WORKING FOR IT,,,THEY ARE ROBING US THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,,,HEY DO YOU REMEMBER THAT WE ARE THE PEOPLE,,,SO GET IT RIGHT,,,
  • makebae  •  5 months ago
    How much money does this guy make? Is he willing to be forced into a pay cut? Something tells me no.
  • theo  •  5 months ago
    why is it so wrong in america to pay the people who actually work there money?
  • Jesse  •  5 months ago
    Try to imagine Wall St. bankers on an assembly line?
  • fred  •  5 months ago
    In 1984 I made $12.50 hr at an aluminum plant in Montana. Now new workers at the Ford plant in Louisville make $15.00 hr. Is that $2.50 hr difference anywhere close to the amount of increase in the cost of living over 27 years? This guy is nuts. Our society has taken a major leap backwards when it comes to making a liveable wage.
  • Gary  •  5 months ago
    What people do not understand, Every job is important in our system. Each and every job moves the economy. For this jerk to think it is unskilled and not worth a livable wage, what does that make him and his job, criminal? He does nothing but figure out how to reduce wages so he can earn millions more, no skill there at all. what he does for a living is help tear this Country down financially so the few can have more, which in turn, weakens this Country from the inside. We spend more on our illegal Military Budget then 2 through 11 combined, wonder where the Military Industrial Complex will go next! I never hear them complain about that cost and the wages in that industry, like 360 million in total cost for one airplane, F22, go figure!
  • -RKO-  •  5 months ago
    "At the bottom of the scale are 200-odd workers technically employed by an outside supplier but who work in the plant moving parts to the assembly line, jobs once done by GM workers paid $29 an hour.' I'll bet if the reporter delved into this a little further, we'd discover that the "outside supplier" bills GM at somwhere between $20 and $30 an hour (maybe more). GM saves money because it doesn't have to pay benefits and insurance; the 'outside supplier' earns a lucrative profit from slave trading; and those poor 200-odd workers get shafted because they're desperate for a job - ANY job, even one that only pays nine bucks an hour as an independent contractor.
  • Been There  •  5 months ago
    If this gentleman(if you can call him that) is a millionaire, he has no idea of what it is like to exist and raise a family of four on $16.00 an hour (with benefits). These people are so out of touch with the general population that they are dangerous to the economy. The current administration has proven that.
  • Stephen  •  5 months ago
    It's A$$hats like Rattner that prove how screwed up our country has become, and why it has become that way: screw over the proudction and service employees instead of cutting superfluous overhead like himself.
  • G I JOE  •  5 months ago
    cut your own pay, you greedy prick!!!!!!!!!!!
  • spike  •  5 months ago
    how about mr. millionaire take a pay cut...stupid ass....
  • Bud  •  5 months ago
    Would he take a "Pay-Cut", if not maybe he should just keep his damn mouth shut. Most of these guy's never started at the low level of a auto-worker, except maybe for Lee Iaocca, who started out as a auto salesman in one of Fords auto stores. I still remember when he became a head huncho and started the program ($56) dollars down for ($56) dollars a month. Anyway thats just a little history, but I'd bet a dollar, if I had a dollar, that this guy wouldn't take a pay-cut, of his Multi-Million dollars. Bud
  • mitomano5  •  5 months ago
    A Dyed in the Wool Douchebag!- Wouldn't give him the Sweat Off My Keester on a Hot Day!

Follow Yahoo! Autos

RESEARCH A CAR

Top Rated

Category: Sedans