2009 Mercedes-Benz SL-Class: User Reviews

2009 Mercedes-Benz SL-Class SL550 Roadster Picture
MSRP:
$95,900 - $190,700
Invoice:
$89,187 - $177,351
User Reviews:
3 reviews
Write a review
Average User Rating
Overall
Satisfaction
Appearance
Comfort
Performance
Value
Read reviews for a specific trim:
Prev | Showing 1 - 3 of 3 | Next
Sort by: most recent | most helpful | highest | lowest
 

Great performance but Command System disappoints

by Ray from Chicago, Illinois (8/17/08)
Pros:Acceleration and handling, great looks, the front end now looks like something a man wants to own.
Cons:Command system is still not up to par. SRS sensor failed in first 1000 miles and needed repairs.

The Command System is still the biggest disappointment in this car. It is hard to use and the voice controls are not that great even when the roof is up. The lack of a touch-screen for navigation is puzzling. Anyone who has operated a touch-screen versus the push button arrow knows that the former is superior. Using an I-Pod is particularly frustrating because voice commands will not work. Also, while the bluetooth works fine for every phone I have tried, if you have a "Smart Phone" forget about being able to upload your contact list and address book. It will not work and this is really annoying. I have tested the Ford/Microsoft "Sync" system recently and it is truly a work of genius for a command system that operates climate control, navigation, telephone, and entertainment. Mercedes needs to get with the program and develop a similar system or pay Ford/Microsoft to license the technology. Customers have been complaining about this for too long now.

30 out of 53 people found this review helpful
      Report abuse
Overall
Satisfaction
Appearance
Comfort
Performance
Value

Closer To Perfection

by Captain MAC from San Diego, CA (6/10/08)
Pros:Great fuel economy while driving sane, better navigation, blue tooth, & Ipod
Cons:Can't find one yet.

The front end, from the A post forward, makes this SL much more robust and likens it to the lengendary late 50's and 60's 300's.
The machine is well tuned and has options, built in, for all types of driving conditions and desires. At over 4,000 lbs. the strength of the car is ever present both in town and on the open road, very tight yet smooth and noiseless.
This SL is another step closer to true perfection in a "hard top roadster".

32 out of 56 people found this review helpful
      Report abuse
Overall
Satisfaction
Appearance
Comfort
Performance
Value

A supercar for for everyday use

by Michael from NY, NY (6/03/08)
Pros:instant acceleration, great handling and brakes
Cons:not as pretty as the earlier model, glitzy in comparison

Same fantastic drivetrain, bulletproof. The composite brakes are spectacular allowing even later braking into curves. The suspension settings are much better than the earlier version absorbing the bumps better and better handling overall. The single piece forged rims are awesome. Time will tell if these changes will prevent the wheel(12 cracked, damaged or bent in 4 years) and tire(18 blown or sidewall damage)the earlier version I had sustained.

30 out of 55 people found this review helpful
      Report abuse
Overall
Satisfaction
Appearance
Comfort
Performance
Value
Prev | Showing 1 - 3 of 3 | Next
<< Back to Model Overview
See a Different Car | or Browse by Category


New Cars On Yahoo! Autos

Research the new 2009 Mercedes-Benz SL-Class on Yahoo! Autos. Check out pictures, prices, features and specs for the new 2009 Mercedes-Benz SL-Class. See the list of 2009 Mercedes-Benz SL-Class trims. Read expert and user reviews about the 2009 Mercedes-Benz SL-Class. Compare between 2009 Mercedes-Benz SL-Class trims to see which one fits you the best. You can also get a free dealer price quote for the new 2009 Mercedes-Benz SL-Class and find new 2009 Mercedes-Benz SL-Class dealer listings near you.

More Cars by Mercedes-Benz


Feedback Help us improve Yahoo! Autos - Send Your Feedback
Copyright © 2008 Automotive Information Center. All Rights Reserved.
Neither Yahoo! nor any of its data or content providers shall be liable for errors
in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.