<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" >
  <channel>
    <title>Yahoo! Autos Reviews: 2004 Volvo S60</title>
    <copyright>Copyright (c) 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved</copyright>
    <link>http://autos.yahoo.com/2004_volvo_s60-reviews_user/</link>
    <description>RSS Feed containing latest reviews for 2004 Volvo S60</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 01:46:53 PST</lastBuildDate>
    
    <item>
      <title>Volvo S60R: The Best All-Around Package (5/5) - Elizabeth from Albuquerque, NM</title>
      <link>http://autos.yahoo.com/2004_volvo_s60-review_user/?reviewId=3&amp;trimId=12617</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://autos.yahoo.com/2004_volvo_s60-review_user/?reviewId=3&amp;trimId=12617</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2005 08:09:32 PST</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[PROS: 6-speed quick to accelerate, trunk space huge, upgraded sound system awesome, 3 settings for chassis <br/><br/> CONS: Turning radius very poor <br/><br/> REVIEW: The S60R is an all-around superb sports sedan. Its value alone is worth the purchase - you get the innovative and top-of-the-line braking system standard, leather standard, active chassis standard (press &quot;comfort&quot; for a smoother ride, &quot;sport&quot; for a bit lower-to-ground and thus  ... <br/></br><a href="http://autos.yahoo.com/2004_volvo_s60-review_user/?reviewId=3&trimId=12617">Read full review </a>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Volvo S60 R &amp;#39;05 - Good could be Great... (3/5) - andrew p. from mountain view, ca</title>
      <link>http://autos.yahoo.com/2004_volvo_s60-review_user/?reviewId=2&amp;trimId=12617</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://autos.yahoo.com/2004_volvo_s60-review_user/?reviewId=2&amp;trimId=12617</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2005 18:29:48 PST</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[PROS: Great Seats, very good handeling, stereo is nice, braking is incredible. <br/><br/> CONS: Not enough room in back seat, turning radius sucks!!! 0-60 is slow for 300hp. <br/><br/> REVIEW: The S60 R is fun to dirve but it is no sports car with the Auto. We&#39;ve had the car know for 4 days. The three things that stand out most (good or bad):
1) brakes 60-0 in 123 ft
2) seats and how comfortable they are
3) how slow the car is from 0-60 with 300 hp under the hood with the  ... <br/></br><a href="http://autos.yahoo.com/2004_volvo_s60-review_user/?reviewId=2&trimId=12617">Read full review </a>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Volvo For Life? Believe it! (5/5) - JJV from Albany, NY</title>
      <link>http://autos.yahoo.com/2004_volvo_s60-review_user/?reviewId=1&amp;trimId=12815</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://autos.yahoo.com/2004_volvo_s60-review_user/?reviewId=1&amp;trimId=12815</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2005 17:17:38 PST</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[PROS: This car is wonderful. Very happy with the mileage, comfortable, tight, relatively quiet ride. <br/><br/> CONS: Just a bit underpowered. Idles rougher than a V engine but smooths out above idle. <br/><br/> REVIEW: Listen, believe and know what Volvo says about how they build their cars for safety. Today, I was forced off the road by a semi into a guardrail at a high speed. In any other car, I really believe I would have been seriously injured or killed. I walked away from the car with a bump on the head and  ... <br/></br><a href="http://autos.yahoo.com/2004_volvo_s60-review_user/?reviewId=1&trimId=12815">Read full review </a>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>S60R- GoodFamily Car that wants to be a sports car (3/5) - Helenanicole14 from Yorkville, Illinois</title>
      <link>http://autos.yahoo.com/2004_volvo_s60-review_user/?reviewId=1&amp;trimId=12617</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://autos.yahoo.com/2004_volvo_s60-review_user/?reviewId=1&amp;trimId=12617</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2005 20:19:06 PST</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[PROS: Comfortable seats, easy to drive, great looking, smooth <br/><br/> CONS: automatic transmission poor, horrible turn radius, no satellite radio <br/><br/> REVIEW: I bought the S60R with the automatic transmission.  Big mistake.  It suffers from major turbo lag.  It is also nearly 2 seconds slower on 0-60.  It goes, but not how I really how I thought it would go.  

On the plus side, the seats are awesome.  Comfortable and supportive.  The sound system is  ... <br/></br><a href="http://autos.yahoo.com/2004_volvo_s60-review_user/?reviewId=1&trimId=12617">Read full review </a>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Great Car! (5/5) - esjohansson from </title>
      <link>http://autos.yahoo.com/2004_volvo_s60-review_user/?reviewId=14&amp;trimId=00000</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://autos.yahoo.com/2004_volvo_s60-review_user/?reviewId=14&amp;trimId=00000</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2004 16:52:00 PDT</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[REVIEW: Quality, safety, ride, mileage, power (over 200 hp 2.5 turbo), and price all add up to a great value. It was either this or a Cadillac CTS...........we are pleased with the choice. ... <br/></br><a href="http://autos.yahoo.com/2004_volvo_s60-review_user/?reviewId=14&trimId=00000">Read full review </a>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Volvo owner for life. (1/5) - eduardovira from </title>
      <link>http://autos.yahoo.com/2004_volvo_s60-review_user/?reviewId=13&amp;trimId=00000</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://autos.yahoo.com/2004_volvo_s60-review_user/?reviewId=13&amp;trimId=00000</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2004 20:42:00 PDT</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[REVIEW: My first car was a hand-me-down Volvo 262. Despite being a twenty five year old car it got me too and from school for four years without any major problems. I recently purchased the 60 and got a great deal. For the money, it is the best European car you can get. Great excelleration and room. <br>No  ... <br/></br><a href="http://autos.yahoo.com/2004_volvo_s60-review_user/?reviewId=13&trimId=00000">Read full review </a>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Excellent with minor annoyances (4/5) - lutzdi from </title>
      <link>http://autos.yahoo.com/2004_volvo_s60-review_user/?reviewId=12&amp;trimId=00000</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://autos.yahoo.com/2004_volvo_s60-review_user/?reviewId=12&amp;trimId=00000</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2004 05:49:00 PDT</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[REVIEW: After driving 13,000 km including one harsh Canadian winter, my S60 2.5 AWD has been a pleasure to drive. I ordered the car with all the bells and whistles, including the navigation system which is impressive and extremely valuable when driving in unfamiliar areas. The 17" wheels and Pirelli P6\'s  ... <br/></br><a href="http://autos.yahoo.com/2004_volvo_s60-review_user/?reviewId=12&trimId=00000">Read full review </a>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>S60R is quick!! (5/5) - dowsk21 from </title>
      <link>http://autos.yahoo.com/2004_volvo_s60-review_user/?reviewId=11&amp;trimId=00000</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://autos.yahoo.com/2004_volvo_s60-review_user/?reviewId=11&amp;trimId=00000</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2004 13:24:00 PDT</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[REVIEW: What a fun car to drive!!  I accelerated to pass a car during my test drive and looked down to see that I was going over 100mph without even realizing it.  I am trying to decide between this car and the Acura TL.  The Volvo is definitely quicker and has the AWD, but the TL is more comfortable and  ... <br/></br><a href="http://autos.yahoo.com/2004_volvo_s60-review_user/?reviewId=11&trimId=00000">Read full review </a>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>King of the Volvos (5/5) - zip4dog from </title>
      <link>http://autos.yahoo.com/2004_volvo_s60-review_user/?reviewId=10&amp;trimId=00000</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://autos.yahoo.com/2004_volvo_s60-review_user/?reviewId=10&amp;trimId=00000</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2004 07:53:00 PDT</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[REVIEW: Way cool. Best value out there, I drove all the AWD sedans. It\'s a hoot to drive good int. room..... a cool car best in it\'s class. ... <br/></br><a href="http://autos.yahoo.com/2004_volvo_s60-review_user/?reviewId=10&trimId=00000">Read full review </a>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Build quality is questionable (2/5) - flyingcold from </title>
      <link>http://autos.yahoo.com/2004_volvo_s60-review_user/?reviewId=9&amp;trimId=00000</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://autos.yahoo.com/2004_volvo_s60-review_user/?reviewId=9&amp;trimId=00000</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2004 00:00:00 PDT</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[REVIEW: After 320 miles on my 2004 S60 the rear brake rotors were found to be warped (really bad vibrations during deceleration).  Of course they were replaced under warranty, but that\'s a MAJOR defect with one of the most basic pieces of safety equipment.<br><br>Other nit-picky stuff that hasn\'t been  ... <br/></br><a href="http://autos.yahoo.com/2004_volvo_s60-review_user/?reviewId=9&trimId=00000">Read full review </a>]]></description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- fe5.autos.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Fri Nov 27 01:46:53 PST 2009 -->
