Copyright (c) 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved http://autos.yahoo.com/2006_mercedes_benz_m_class-reviews_user/ RSS Feed containing latest reviews for 2006 Mercedes-Benz M-Class en-us Sat, 28 Nov 2009 11:29:14 PST 40 40 http://autos.yahoo.com/2006_mercedes_benz_m_class-reviews_user/ http://l.yimg.com/a/i/us/nt/ma/ma_aut_1.gif http://autos.yahoo.com/2006_mercedes_benz_m_class-review_user/?reviewId=120&trimId=16830 http://autos.yahoo.com/2006_mercedes_benz_m_class-review_user/?reviewId=120&trimId=16830 Sat, 24 Mar 2007 23:27:33 PDT
CONS: A lot

REVIEW: Mercedes people, please don't mix anymore your cars with american brands, since Daymler bought Chrysler Mercedes'll started being so bad. Why? It's relly obbious. The are making some parts here and ensambling it here to, result: American manufactured cars what means problems. ...

Read full review ]]> http://autos.yahoo.com/2006_mercedes_benz_m_class-review_user/?reviewId=119&trimId=16830 http://autos.yahoo.com/2006_mercedes_benz_m_class-review_user/?reviewId=119&trimId=16830 Tue, 20 Mar 2007 10:12:49 PDT
CONS: terrible reliability,electronic gremlins pop out on a monthly basis.

REVIEW: this is my second merecedes product and it is fraught with the same electronic problems as my 2003 e-class, blower Motors that run when the car is off,srs failures every 4 months,abs warning lights that are false,directional bulb failures almost monthly..The germans overcomplicate the electronics ...

Read full review ]]> http://autos.yahoo.com/2006_mercedes_benz_m_class-review_user/?reviewId=43&trimId=16831 http://autos.yahoo.com/2006_mercedes_benz_m_class-review_user/?reviewId=43&trimId=16831 Mon, 19 Mar 2007 12:47:57 PDT
CONS: Rough tranny downshift from 2nd to 1st; many electrical problems; noisy lifters; lack of parts local

REVIEW: Since May of 2005, my 2006 ML500 has been in the Mercedes Hospital no less that 6 times (not for normal service) sometimes for 10 days at a time. Numerous computer sensor problems and no parts available for 6 - 8 weeks are only begininng. Then I had malfunctioning door handles, improperly ...

Read full review ]]> http://autos.yahoo.com/2006_mercedes_benz_m_class-review_user/?reviewId=118&trimId=16830 http://autos.yahoo.com/2006_mercedes_benz_m_class-review_user/?reviewId=118&trimId=16830 Sat, 17 Mar 2007 18:03:49 PDT
CONS: Gas milage

REVIEW: This is a true MB and true SUV. No complaint. The gas milage can be better. But that may have a trade for less power. ...

Read full review ]]> http://autos.yahoo.com/2006_mercedes_benz_m_class-review_user/?reviewId=117&trimId=16830 http://autos.yahoo.com/2006_mercedes_benz_m_class-review_user/?reviewId=117&trimId=16830 Sat, 10 Mar 2007 10:12:32 PST
CONS: could be better on gas

REVIEW: I have found this car to be better than I expected. I heard alot of quality issues with MB but this car has been more than reliable. The handling is probably best in class and the engine is first rate! The engine feels like a V8 not a V6. ...

Read full review ]]> http://autos.yahoo.com/2006_mercedes_benz_m_class-review_user/?reviewId=116&trimId=16830 http://autos.yahoo.com/2006_mercedes_benz_m_class-review_user/?reviewId=116&trimId=16830 Tue, 06 Mar 2007 07:33:48 PST
CONS: trany,trany,trany lacks exclusivity for an MB

REVIEW: this is our 2nd 2006 ml 350 the first one we purchased was one of the launch editions in march 2005. it was by far the worst car i have ever purchased. the first 4 weeks the car was at the dealership 3 weeks with transmission problems. next the power seats stopped working it was in the shop 2 more ...

Read full review ]]> http://autos.yahoo.com/2006_mercedes_benz_m_class-review_user/?reviewId=115&trimId=16830 http://autos.yahoo.com/2006_mercedes_benz_m_class-review_user/?reviewId=115&trimId=16830 Sat, 17 Feb 2007 11:04:37 PST
CONS: Major transmission problems, rear wheel problems,peeling steering wheel, electrical problems

REVIEW: We have purchased 4 MB's and this one, 2006 ml350 is the worst vehicle we have ever purchased. We still have our 1996 c 220 and 1998 SLK but the 2006 ml350 is a lemon. It has been in the shop for repairs more than any vehicle we have ever owned. I do not recommend purchasing this car. The ...

Read full review ]]> http://autos.yahoo.com/2006_mercedes_benz_m_class-review_user/?reviewId=114&trimId=16830 http://autos.yahoo.com/2006_mercedes_benz_m_class-review_user/?reviewId=114&trimId=16830 Thu, 15 Feb 2007 17:17:05 PST
CONS: Transmission problems from the start, no noise insulation in the doors and chrome interior is peelin

REVIEW: I have been into the dealer too many times (while I pay for a loaner). Each time I am promised it is fixed (told it is a computerized transmission problem... easily fixed with an update) it retuns to clunking soon after leaving the dealer. The fake chrome peeled off the steering wheel and sliced my ...

Read full review ]]> http://autos.yahoo.com/2006_mercedes_benz_m_class-review_user/?reviewId=113&trimId=16830 http://autos.yahoo.com/2006_mercedes_benz_m_class-review_user/?reviewId=113&trimId=16830 Mon, 12 Feb 2007 11:50:11 PST
CONS: Price, Very expensive options

REVIEW: I bought the SUV 6 weeks ago with the offroad package and many other EXPENSIVE options. I have been extremely pleased with the way it performs both on and offroad so far. ...

Read full review ]]> http://autos.yahoo.com/2006_mercedes_benz_m_class-review_user/?reviewId=40&trimId=16831 http://autos.yahoo.com/2006_mercedes_benz_m_class-review_user/?reviewId=40&trimId=16831 Mon, 29 Jan 2007 05:18:16 PST
CONS: Mercedes needs to offer more options as Standard

REVIEW: I don't understand reviews where people complain about the transmission on this vehicle!! If you know how to drive this is the best transmission ever!! Just don't jump back and forth on the gas in slow traffic!! Drive steady. I have had this vehicle for a year and not one problem!! I ...

Read full review ]]>