Copyright (c) 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved http://autos.yahoo.com/2006_cadillac_cts-reviews_user/ RSS Feed containing latest reviews for 2006 Cadillac CTS en-us Sun, 29 Nov 2009 15:18:21 PST 40 40 http://autos.yahoo.com/2006_cadillac_cts-reviews_user/ http://l.yimg.com/a/i/us/nt/ma/ma_aut_1.gif http://autos.yahoo.com/2006_cadillac_cts-review_user/?reviewId=36&trimId=17055 http://autos.yahoo.com/2006_cadillac_cts-review_user/?reviewId=36&trimId=17055 Fri, 30 Mar 2007 09:57:10 PDT
CONS: Brakes sometimes feel a bit soft, lots of brake dust on front tires

REVIEW: Overall, this is a great vehicle. I bought a 2006 3.6L in August and the only problem I've had was a dead battery. Great service to get this fixed - we called the roadside assistance number and the tow truck was in our driveway within about 30 minutes. The guy quickly replaced the battery ...

Read full review ]]> http://autos.yahoo.com/2006_cadillac_cts-review_user/?reviewId=35&trimId=17055 http://autos.yahoo.com/2006_cadillac_cts-review_user/?reviewId=35&trimId=17055 Thu, 22 Mar 2007 21:04:37 PDT
CONS: Bad brakes,fuel leakage,rear end leakage,engine light always on

REVIEW: If you are looking to buy this car.......do yourself a favor dont buy it.looks could fool you...GM doesnt stand buy the product neither does Herb Chambers Cadillac,poor service,poor managerment,nothing but problems from day one...this car is a saftey problem ....Stay away from headaches not worth ...

Read full review ]]> http://autos.yahoo.com/2006_cadillac_cts-review_user/?reviewId=34&trimId=17055 http://autos.yahoo.com/2006_cadillac_cts-review_user/?reviewId=34&trimId=17055 Sun, 14 Jan 2007 14:05:17 PST
CONS: Tight rear seat, cheap leather, tilted center controls, too much body lean

REVIEW: We tested a BMW 525i, Cadillac CTS, Lexus GS300, and Volvo S80 and ended up getting the BMW. The second choice was the Cadillac since we have a GM Card, but we weren't too crazy about it. The things that I did like was that it's quick from a stop, which is a major plus. The styling is ...

Read full review ]]> http://autos.yahoo.com/2006_cadillac_cts-review_user/?reviewId=17&trimId=17054 http://autos.yahoo.com/2006_cadillac_cts-review_user/?reviewId=17&trimId=17054 Thu, 28 Dec 2006 15:59:51 PST
CONS: would like a little more power when passing

REVIEW: I love my car, however I recently noticed when passing other cars that I could use a little more power to feel safe. I test drove a 2006 3.6l and when I bought this 2007 I was told it had the same engine as the car I had test driven. My mistake, I bought this car off the dealership floor ...

Read full review ]]> http://autos.yahoo.com/2006_cadillac_cts-review_user/?reviewId=33&trimId=17055 http://autos.yahoo.com/2006_cadillac_cts-review_user/?reviewId=33&trimId=17055 Tue, 26 Dec 2006 08:00:44 PST
CONS: THE RIDE HAS BEEN BUMPY I HAD TO HAVE 4 NEW TIRES PUT ON FROM JUNE 2006 TO DEC 2006.

REVIEW: I thought when you get a CADILLIC it was suppose to be smooth sailing as far as your ride (not true) I have nothing but frustration. I brought my car in June 2006 and have had nothing but problems. I had a oil sealant to leak, noise in the tires I have been to the dealer 5 times that is not good. ...

Read full review ]]> http://autos.yahoo.com/2006_cadillac_cts-review_user/?reviewId=16&trimId=17054 http://autos.yahoo.com/2006_cadillac_cts-review_user/?reviewId=16&trimId=17054 Fri, 22 Dec 2006 11:03:04 PST
CONS: Glove box could be a little larger

REVIEW: I bought my new 2006 CTS in Dec 05 and I absolutely love it! It is sporty with black exterior, black interior and moon roof and it is so much fun to drive! I looked at a lot of cars before buying and they all looked so similar. I saw a CTS like mine and instantly knew that was the car I wanted. ...

Read full review ]]> http://autos.yahoo.com/2006_cadillac_cts-review_user/?reviewId=32&trimId=17055 http://autos.yahoo.com/2006_cadillac_cts-review_user/?reviewId=32&trimId=17055 Wed, 20 Dec 2006 12:37:13 PST
CONS: Bose sound system vs. other premium sound systems

REVIEW: Excellent value for the money. CTS must have 17" wheels or bigger for appearances. Sport package & 3.6L highly recommended. This is the next best car to the BMW 330i. ...

Read full review ]]> http://autos.yahoo.com/2006_cadillac_cts-review_user/?reviewId=15&trimId=17054 http://autos.yahoo.com/2006_cadillac_cts-review_user/?reviewId=15&trimId=17054 Tue, 28 Nov 2006 16:18:19 PST
CONS: Rear seat leg room, Interior needs more elegance.

REVIEW: I have own this vehicle for about 6 months and I have had no problems. I went cheap and settled for the 2.8L but I convinced my rich brother in-law to purchase the CTS-V (now that's power) so I get to drive it on rare occasions. I regret not getting the 3.6L...ohh well. I really like the fact ...

Read full review ]]> http://autos.yahoo.com/2006_cadillac_cts-review_user/?reviewId=31&trimId=17055 http://autos.yahoo.com/2006_cadillac_cts-review_user/?reviewId=31&trimId=17055 Sun, 29 Oct 2006 15:04:10 PST
CONS: Tight front compartment; not sufficient storage space

REVIEW: Car handles well, a little crowded in the drivers compartment for larger adults; ride although a little rough is solid. The large six cylinder is a minimum; smaller one is too small for acceptable performance. ...

Read full review ]]> http://autos.yahoo.com/2006_cadillac_cts-review_user/?reviewId=30&trimId=17055 http://autos.yahoo.com/2006_cadillac_cts-review_user/?reviewId=30&trimId=17055 Thu, 26 Oct 2006 18:29:41 PDT
CONS: None

REVIEW: Hands down the best car I'ved owned. 3.6 V6 is fast, 0-60 in 6.6 (ok), but 60-120, in a blink of an eye, PRICELESS. The rev limiter stopped me at 128 mph, but she'd go to 150 if I could turn it off. Handles better the faster you go. Already toasted a WRX turbo, 300C hemi, 1999 Mustang, ...

Read full review ]]>