<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" >
  <channel>
    <title>Yahoo! Autos Reviews: 2009 GMC Truck Sierra 1500 Regular Cab 2WD</title>
    <copyright>Copyright (c) 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved</copyright>
    <link>http://autos.yahoo.com/2009_gmc_truck_sierra_1500_regular_cab_2wd-reviews_user/</link>
    <description>RSS Feed containing latest reviews for 2009 GMC Truck Sierra 1500 Regular Cab 2WD</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:39:28 PST</lastBuildDate>
    
    <item>
      <title>Best truck for the money (5/5) - Larry from Lincolnton,NC</title>
      <link>http://autos.yahoo.com/2009_gmc_truck_sierra_1500_regular_cab_2wd-review_user/?reviewId=1&amp;trimId=24896</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://autos.yahoo.com/2009_gmc_truck_sierra_1500_regular_cab_2wd-review_user/?reviewId=1&amp;trimId=24896</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 11:39:37 PDT</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[PROS: Nice looking, with a big truck feel.Would never guess it has a V-6. <br/><br/> CONS: None <br/><br/> REVIEW: We bought this truck to have when we went to nursery, home improvements stores or just needed to haul something. We love it but try not to drive it too much as gas is so expensive. If you plan on pulling something, get the V-8. The 6 is fine for my needs, but the 8 has 100 more HP with about the  ... <br/></br><a href="http://autos.yahoo.com/2009_gmc_truck_sierra_1500_regular_cab_2wd-review_user/?reviewId=1&trimId=24896">Read full review </a>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>the new gmc sierra and GMC/CHEVY trucks (3/5) - cd..ASE cert mechanic from houston, tx</title>
      <link>http://autos.yahoo.com/2009_gmc_truck_sierra_1500_regular_cab_2wd-review_user/?reviewId=1&amp;trimId=24895</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://autos.yahoo.com/2009_gmc_truck_sierra_1500_regular_cab_2wd-review_user/?reviewId=1&amp;trimId=24895</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 06:55:13 PDT</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[PROS: looks good. solid trucks for the most part <br/><br/> CONS: expensive like all new trucks, gas mileage should be inproved w/o resorting to a hybrid <br/><br/> REVIEW: always nice looking trucks from GMC /CHEVY. hopefully there piston slap problem is no longer an issue that it is with the previous body style trucks. also the  the ancient, but good,  4.3 V6 and the 4.8L v8 were mentioned only. are the 5.3L still available? i noticed the performance  of the 4.8 is  ... <br/></br><a href="http://autos.yahoo.com/2009_gmc_truck_sierra_1500_regular_cab_2wd-review_user/?reviewId=1&trimId=24895">Read full review </a>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>No frills, great value (4/5) - Greg Vojtko from Highland, CA</title>
      <link>http://autos.yahoo.com/2009_gmc_truck_sierra_1500_regular_cab_2wd-review_user/?reviewId=1&amp;trimId=24893</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://autos.yahoo.com/2009_gmc_truck_sierra_1500_regular_cab_2wd-review_user/?reviewId=1&amp;trimId=24893</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 00:58:53 PDT</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[PROS: comfortable and safe, I feel very safe in this vehicle.  Few bells and whistles, there&#39;s little to b <br/><br/> CONS: engine a bit underpowered for so large a vehicle, but driving faster would burn more fuel faster too <br/><br/> REVIEW: This is the first truck I&#39;ve owned and as a result of the great experience I&#39;ll probably stick with the GMC Sierra 1500 for future truck purchases too. ... <br/></br><a href="http://autos.yahoo.com/2009_gmc_truck_sierra_1500_regular_cab_2wd-review_user/?reviewId=1&trimId=24893">Read full review </a>]]></description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- fe9.autos.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Mon Nov 23 14:39:28 PST 2009 -->
