<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" >
  <channel>
    <title>Yahoo! Autos Reviews: 2010 Cadillac SRX</title>
    <copyright>Copyright (c) 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved</copyright>
    <link>http://autos.yahoo.com/2010_cadillac_srx-reviews_user/</link>
    <description>RSS Feed containing latest reviews for 2010 Cadillac SRX</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:44:53 PST</lastBuildDate>
    
    <item>
      <title>Best in its category! (5/5) - William from </title>
      <link>http://autos.yahoo.com/2010_cadillac_srx-review_user/?reviewId=6&amp;trimId=26561</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://autos.yahoo.com/2010_cadillac_srx-review_user/?reviewId=6&amp;trimId=26561</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 01:01:39 PST</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[PROS: Top Pick In Its Class <br/><br/> CONS: Engine performance at low start-up speed could be better. <br/><br/> REVIEW: I was initially attracted to the SRX by its looks and its attractive pricing.  It has fully met my expectations.  It is simply the best looking crossover SUV on the market today.  I recently took the SRX on a trip of over 200 miles and it performed fantastically at highway speeds. It could stand  ... <br/></br><a href="http://autos.yahoo.com/2010_cadillac_srx-review_user/?reviewId=6&trimId=26561">Read full review </a>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Love 99% of it (4/5) - vicki from </title>
      <link>http://autos.yahoo.com/2010_cadillac_srx-review_user/?reviewId=3&amp;trimId=26565</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://autos.yahoo.com/2010_cadillac_srx-review_user/?reviewId=3&amp;trimId=26565</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 10:34:11 PST</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[PROS: Looks, comfort, performance, fuel economy <br/><br/> CONS: haunted memory seats <br/><br/> REVIEW: I have had my SRX for about 1 month and I love it.  It gets a lot of looks.  Fuel economy is good for an AWD.  Plenty of room for back seat passangers.  Love the ambiance lighting in the interior.  Only problem we&#39;ve had is with the haunted memory seats.  The memory set does not seem to hold  ... <br/></br><a href="http://autos.yahoo.com/2010_cadillac_srx-review_user/?reviewId=3&trimId=26565">Read full review </a>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Cadillac &amp;quot;Hottest Crossover SUV on the market&amp;quot; (5/5) - NidiaD from </title>
      <link>http://autos.yahoo.com/2010_cadillac_srx-review_user/?reviewId=5&amp;trimId=26563</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://autos.yahoo.com/2010_cadillac_srx-review_user/?reviewId=5&amp;trimId=26563</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 04:14:17 PST</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[PROS: World Class Luxury and Best Styling in a Small SUV. Clean Sharp Lines <br/><br/> CONS: Wish it Had Power tilt and telescopic Steering Wheel With Memory <br/><br/> REVIEW: I did all the research then drove all the top picks the Audi Q5, Cadillac SRX, BMW M3 and M5 , Lexus RX350 and Mercedes ML and the GLK. After driving them all I went for the Cadillac I love the Style the comfort the space and places for all my belongings that I travel with there is a  cell phone  ... <br/></br><a href="http://autos.yahoo.com/2010_cadillac_srx-review_user/?reviewId=5&trimId=26563">Read full review </a>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ford Expedition V8 gets better MPG! (3/5) - Brucer from </title>
      <link>http://autos.yahoo.com/2010_cadillac_srx-review_user/?reviewId=2&amp;trimId=26565</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://autos.yahoo.com/2010_cadillac_srx-review_user/?reviewId=2&amp;trimId=26565</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 21:23:28 PST</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[PROS: Lower priced Cadillac <br/><br/> CONS: Cheap version of a Cadillac - poor MPG and fake rims, oh and LCD screen messes up already <br/><br/> REVIEW: I never should have got rid of my 2004 Ford Expedition.  It got the same MPG as this Cadillac and it was a V8!  Compared to the Ford, this Caddy has less luxury, more fake stuff going on (exhaust, chrome rims), less power, less MPG.  Thanks GM!  

Accelleration is about like a VW bug, putting  ... <br/></br><a href="http://autos.yahoo.com/2010_cadillac_srx-review_user/?reviewId=2&trimId=26565">Read full review </a>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Did not buy (4/5) - Alberto from </title>
      <link>http://autos.yahoo.com/2010_cadillac_srx-review_user/?reviewId=2&amp;trimId=26562</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://autos.yahoo.com/2010_cadillac_srx-review_user/?reviewId=2&amp;trimId=26562</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 12:35:57 PST</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[PROS: Truly Luxurious <br/><br/> CONS: Engine performance <br/><br/> REVIEW: Beautiful automobile, but I did not buy this car because when you need acceleration...it&#39;s not there.  Fuel economy is the same as other crossovers that have bigger, more powerful engines.  I didn&#39;t have the time to wait for the turbo model to come out. ... <br/></br><a href="http://autos.yahoo.com/2010_cadillac_srx-review_user/?reviewId=2&trimId=26562">Read full review </a>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Nice car - but not enough power. (4/5) - James P from </title>
      <link>http://autos.yahoo.com/2010_cadillac_srx-review_user/?reviewId=2&amp;trimId=00000</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://autos.yahoo.com/2010_cadillac_srx-review_user/?reviewId=2&amp;trimId=00000</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 10:00:50 PST</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[PROS: Great Techology <br/><br/> CONS: Inadequate Power <br/><br/> REVIEW: Have had this car for two months.  It looks great and handles ok.  Unfortunately, too many blind spots.  The only real negative is that the car is underpowered for its size.  Wish I waited until the turbo model was out. ... <br/></br><a href="http://autos.yahoo.com/2010_cadillac_srx-review_user/?reviewId=2&trimId=00000">Read full review </a>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Best Crossover in its class! (5/5) - Douglas from </title>
      <link>http://autos.yahoo.com/2010_cadillac_srx-review_user/?reviewId=4&amp;trimId=26563</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://autos.yahoo.com/2010_cadillac_srx-review_user/?reviewId=4&amp;trimId=26563</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 08:24:13 PST</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[PROS: Great Instrumentation, Styling, Entertainment system, and VALUE! <br/><br/> CONS: Noisy engine at higher RPM <br/><br/> REVIEW: After owning an Infifinti QX4 and Acura MDX, and my wife had the Acura RL and now a Lexus RX350, I would have never thought that I would have gone back to an American car until I saw the Cadillac SRX. I did all the research online at several sites, and narrowed my choices down to another MDX, a  ... <br/></br><a href="http://autos.yahoo.com/2010_cadillac_srx-review_user/?reviewId=4&trimId=26563">Read full review </a>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SRX...nice crossover improved appearance (4/5) - Maverick from </title>
      <link>http://autos.yahoo.com/2010_cadillac_srx-review_user/?reviewId=4&amp;trimId=26564</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://autos.yahoo.com/2010_cadillac_srx-review_user/?reviewId=4&amp;trimId=26564</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 21:56:43 PST</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[REVIEW: great car...i drove the cayenne, bmw, audi, and mercedes and i thought the Cadillac was the 2nd best overall.  Porsche Cayenne was far superior to all 5, but was too expensive.  The Cadillac can also be bought for much less than any of the other 4, and i personally thought it drove better than all  ... <br/></br><a href="http://autos.yahoo.com/2010_cadillac_srx-review_user/?reviewId=4&trimId=26564">Read full review </a>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Great Car (5/5) - Michael from </title>
      <link>http://autos.yahoo.com/2010_cadillac_srx-review_user/?reviewId=2&amp;trimId=26566</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://autos.yahoo.com/2010_cadillac_srx-review_user/?reviewId=2&amp;trimId=26566</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 17:51:40 PST</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[PROS: Very comfortable, good finishes,excellent pop up GPS and SAT radio <br/><br/> CONS: I wish it got better gas milage, but at least runs on regular gas <br/><br/> REVIEW: We have had this car for about two months and really enjoy driving it. We love the styling, finish  and feel of the car.  It has lots of technology built into the car. ... <br/></br><a href="http://autos.yahoo.com/2010_cadillac_srx-review_user/?reviewId=2&trimId=26566">Read full review </a>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Finally a great American vehicle!!! (4/5) - JasperC from </title>
      <link>http://autos.yahoo.com/2010_cadillac_srx-review_user/?reviewId=3&amp;trimId=26563</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://autos.yahoo.com/2010_cadillac_srx-review_user/?reviewId=3&amp;trimId=26563</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 12:18:48 PDT</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[PROS: Appearance inside and out, ride and drive. <br/><br/> CONS: Weak engine and rear leg room. <br/><br/> REVIEW: I have had my new SRX for about two weeks now and I have two words, &quot;LOVE IT!!!&quot;.  I was looking at the Lexus RX and Audi Q5.  My whole life, I have rode and driven Japanese and European cars from the cheapest to the most expensive ones and I have to say I am PROUD to finally buy  ... <br/></br><a href="http://autos.yahoo.com/2010_cadillac_srx-review_user/?reviewId=3&trimId=26563">Read full review </a>]]></description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- fe7.autos.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Mon Nov 30 15:44:53 PST 2009 -->
