Search

Chevy Volt faces defect probe after two new battery fires

Federal auto safety regulators launched their first defect probe into the Chevrolet Volt on Friday after two Volt battery packs caught fire following simulated crash tests.

Despite the fires not involving customers, the probe gives General Motors exactly the kind of public black eye it wanted to avoid as it touted the Volt’s complicated combo of gasoline engine and lithium-ion battery pack as a rally flag for the company's technology.

Earlier this month, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration revealed that a Volt battery pack had smoked and caught fire more than three weeks after a side-impact test where the car had been smashed into a pole at 20 mph. At the time, GM had said the agency had not followed the automaker’s procedures for discharging the battery following a crash, and had it done so, there would have been no fire.

Today, NHTSA said it had recorded two more fires after simulated crash tests on three of the Volt’s 390-lb. lithium-ion battery packs, rupturing their coolant lines and damaging their outer compartments. In one test, following the simulated crash, the battery pack began to smoke and throw sparks after it was rotated 180 degrees. Another pack that had been tested last Thursday and only shown a slight increase in temperature caught fire on Thanksgiving.

NHTSA says the tests were meant to show how the Volt might respond to real-world impacts side-on into narrow objects such as poles or trees. The Volt's battery packs hold 32 kWh of electricity when fully charged, or about what a typical American household uses in two days; it can travel about 40 miles on a full charge before the gas engine kicks in to provide an additional 340 miles of travel.

The agency said it opened the probe because it was “concerned that damage to the Volt’s batteries as part of three tests…have resulted in fire.”

In a statement, GM said it would work with the agency, maintaining “the Volt is safe and does not present undue risk as part of normal operation or immediately after a severe crash. “

No fires have been reported by Volt owners since the car went on sale last December, and two garage fires that started with Volts present were later tied to other heat sources. But GM has sold only 5,003 through October, still vowing to hit 10,000 copies this year and 45,000 next year. Even the whiff of trouble about the Volt's technology will only make that target harder to reach.

Contact Justin Hyde via email or Twitter

 

4 comments

  • Stinky McGee  •  5 months ago
    The Volt costs pennies on the dollar in fuel costs compared to an internal-combustion (IC) engine only powered car. Electricity can be generated by domestic natural gas resources much more efficiently and converted to motion than a IC engine.
  • B man  •  5 months ago
    Car fires are not an insignificant threat. 215,000 car fires occured in 2010. Every one of those in a petroleum based car. At the end of the day based on what we currently know, the difficulty with which fire can be induced in an electric vehicle and the long delay before said fire will occur gives the advantage to the electric vehicle over an internal combustion vehicle in fire safety. Undoubtedly GM et al will only get better at understanding how to prevent fires with Li batteries. The NHTSA findings could just as easily be reported using the headline above.
  • PROTECTNSERVE  •  5 months ago
    I was in line to get a volt before they price jump, I will wait for the price to drop some till I get mine.
  • Scooter  •  5 months ago
    The car is just a total bust, offering no real benefits over a prius, though it is priced more like a Infiniti G37, but styling, and overall quality is more like a Hyundai elantra. There are no savings to be had when your car payment touches $700 a month no counting your electricty use and some gas fillups. This car doesnt save the enviroment either as it consumes more electricity, any smart person knows that electricity uses gas just everything else to be produced. Therefore, there are just about no benefits to this car, only tolook like a hipster, planet saving wanna be.
    • B man 5 months ago
      How about a huge reduction in my gas bill which would equate to US Independence on Foreign Oil (if the masses were doing the same)! I drive to work and back not using one cent of gas. Can a Prius say that, NOT! I think you missed those two very very important facts. Think about how much better our economy would be if we weren't over there spending billions of dollars on BS in the Middle East!!!!!!!

Follow Yahoo! Autos

RESEARCH A CAR

Top Rated

Category: Sedans

More Articles

  • Most improved cars 2012 Marco R. della Cava

    Total Car Score recently released a list of Most Improved Cars for 2012, highlighting eight redesigned automobiles whose improvements helped the models’ scores jump significantly over 2011.

  • Memorial Day means many things to Americans: An opportunity to remember those who've died in service of their country. A chance to get together with friends and relatives. Cookouts. Picnics. Box socials. (They still have those, right?)

  • Take one look at these purpose-built sports cars and you'd expect them to be fast. You would be wrong. Even before we got used to powerful V6 Camrys, these ten rides chosen by Jalopnik readers were the slowest sports cars the world had ever seen.

  • "High performance" and "fuel efficient" need not be mutually exclusive terms, thanks to some truly quick cars that get surprisingly respectable mileage.

  • One of the most widely accepted bits of advice you’ll find presented in practically every consumer magazine as Wisdom From Upon High is a bad idea.