Search

Road Test: 2012 Volvo S60 T6 R-Design

It’s not your mom’s three-box tank—but it’s not quite Bavarian sporty, either.

For the past couple decades, Volvo seemed content being known as a risk-adverse suburban mobile – more concerned with how safely its cars can shuttle kids to school rather than how neutral it throttles out of the apex. But that’s changed recently, and the boxy 240 or 760 tanks of the past have been replaced with swoopish saloons. And with the Volvo S60 T6 R-Design, the company takes aim at entry-level luxury sedans such as the Audi A4, BMW 3 Series, and Lexus IS.

Visually there’s no objectionable detail, inside or out. A subtle character line stretches across the side profile of the car, and the lower rocker panel crease (a design trait so commonplace it borders on cliché) helps make the S60 appear trim and athletic. Its interior is fittingly luxurious for its segment, with tasteful aluminum accents and matte-finished plastics. The leather seats coddle occupants with a balance of comfort and support. And it’s a dream to cruise in — the cabin remains hushed even when approaching triple-digit speeds, undisturbed by kinks and bends in the road. But although on par with the Bavarian competition in refinement, the interior design still seems a bit too cold; it’s quintessentially Scandinavian, and those who are used to the alluring lines of the Audi A4 may find the S60 too industrial.

Whether you’re a fan of the quirky aesthetics or not, the ergonomics will likely be a letdown. The bulk of the climate control, audio and navigation buttons are clustered in an unintuitive keypad layout, and it’s a driving distraction when you can’t figure out which function is where; one colleague didn’t even realize the car had a navigation system until I pointed it out. Even when you’ve discovered the nav system, its performance is subpar. A smart phone could map a better route, and the controls are needlessly fussy. Also, key features are buried — after lots of digging, I discovered that it’s possible to turn off the stability control system, or at least set it to sport mode.

Fortunately, the driving dynamics fare better. While it’s no 3-Series killer on the turns, the S60’s chassis feels composed, and the tail faithfully rotates around corners even with traction control on, thanks to the responsive AWD. When pushed, however, there’s enough body roll to discourage at-the-limit driving. But it’s not a car meant to be flogged in turns — and to be fair, most would never push a Infiniti G37 or a BMW 335i that hard, either.

Power delivery is a mixed bag. With 354 ft-lbs of torque, the 3.0-liter V-6 has enough pull to quash any notions of Volvos being stodgy; turbo lag, if any, is imperceptible, and revs climb vigorously right to redline. Spirited acceleration, however, is soured by finicky throttle mapping. Lightly press the gas and it crawls off the line like a skittish mom in a Volvo 850 wagon. Add a touch more gas it lurches forward like a teenager on a learning permit. And woe to your neck if you put it in the 6-speed Geartronic automatic’s sport mode — mini-bouts of whiplash are inevitable on tip-in.

Although it may be underwhelming to hardcore sports sedan aficionados, that’s not to say the S60 T6 R-Design is a bad car. For the most part, it’s an enjoyable cruiser, one that’s content to stay under the radar. But at this price point, it’s the little things that make the difference. And at a tested price of $46,875, there are too many foibles to make this a stand-out over the already-crowded sports luxury sedan field.

Class
Luxury sports sedan
Capacity
Five passengers
Engine
3.0-liter turbo 6 cylinder
TransmissionSix-speed automatic
Horsepower
325 hp
Torque
354 ft-lbs
0-60 5.5 seconds
Mileage
18/26 city/hwy
Base price (incl dest charges)
$42,500
Takeaway
Volvo's sportiest luxury saloon yet.

 

8 comments

  • Robert  •  5 months ago
    Reading a owners guide that comes with a car would be a big help for the helpless drivers that wrote this article. Drive a Volvo and then try to find something better for less...Impossible!!!
  • mazwa1  •  5 months ago
    Visit http://faradisy.com for car photo
  • Michael A  •  5 months ago
    The Chinese bought Volvo from Ford - I wouldn't touch a Volvo these days.
  • Scott  •  5 months ago
    I owned a 2011 S60 sedan. After five weeks I hated the car and traded it for a 2011 Dodge Challenger SRT8 392. I hated the Volvo (and the dealer that sold that car to me) so much I was motivated to add a page on my personal web site about that car. The list of cr@ppy things about that car were never ending: worst seats of any car I've EVER owned; ultra-expensive stereo with little bass response and door panels that rattled so badly that whatever bass you dialed in was unbearable; tons of road noise coming through the floor boards - at 80MPH you couldn't hold a decent conversation without feeling like you were yelling at your co-driver; car plowed into corners and turns with lots of understeer; the softest paint I've ever seen - my car had so many scratches EVERYWHERE that when the sun shone off of the root-beer metallic paint that you wondered if the car was covered with spider webs; unintuitive center console that LOOKS cool but you have to look at the controls to do anything (not a good idea at speed). After reading all the great reviews about the Volvo I was supremely upset with this car - I gladly took a bath on that car to get it out of my garage. In contrast, my 470HP Dodge gets comparable gas mileage (sounds weird, but true); superior seats & stereo; not a single scratch; fantastic build quality, and the admiring looks and comments are never ending. Not to mention feeling my heart beat quicken EVERY time I walk towards my car is PRICELESS.
  • Anubis  •  5 months ago
    Seems fairly flawed.
  • Buck Ofama  •  5 months ago
    if this car had a BMW or Mercedes badge on it this reviewer would be wetting his pants over it. And it doesn't come with a V6
    • ardo123 5 months ago
      did you even read the article???
  • Michael Cox  •  5 months ago
    Wow!! The 1st Letter!! And Mine!! IF "VOLVO" can keep things going in their country of SWEDEN, I, too, wish that the other SWEDISH car company, "SAAB", can still be around, even though two {2}, CHINESE COMPANIES OWN A SIZABLE AMOUNT OF SAAB, NOW. Besides, VICTOR MUELLER IS OUT AS IS!! It has to be EXTREMELY TOUGH for the SWEDES to have only two {2}, car companies. Here's to SWEDEN & ITS SWEDES to get on a MORE PROSPEROUS road & have a better life & keep their CAR COMPANIES going, NO matter WHO owns them. And, here's to the JAPANESE on a "SPEEDY" RECOVERY to their country, industries, people and all, for 2012. "WE ALL" can only wish that ALL of US in the bruised U.S.A. can pull through its various problems, too. PEACE ON EARTH & GOODWILL TO EVERYBODY!! GOD BLESS "US ALL"!! count your blessings. where does the time go?? 2012?? oh boy. {m.e.cox/fri./dec./9th/2011/7:00-p.m./e.s.t./pinellas county/florida}.
  • Jose  •  5 months ago
    wait 'til a real driver step in and you will see the real difference,My V70 R series easily beats
    a 32i beemer,on curves or stretch all the way from LA to vegas.

Follow Yahoo! Autos

MORE ON THIS CAR

2012 Volvo S60

2012 Volvo S60
4.83 stars
(Based on 84 reviews)
MSRP
$31,300 - $42,950
Invoice
$29,422 - $40,373

RESEARCH A CAR

Top Rated

Category: Sedans

More Articles

  • Most improved cars 2012 Marco R. della Cava

    Total Car Score recently released a list of Most Improved Cars for 2012, highlighting eight redesigned automobiles whose improvements helped the models’ scores jump significantly over 2011.

  • Memorial Day means many things to Americans: An opportunity to remember those who've died in service of their country. A chance to get together with friends and relatives. Cookouts. Picnics. Box socials. (They still have those, right?)

  • Take one look at these purpose-built sports cars and you'd expect them to be fast. You would be wrong. Even before we got used to powerful V6 Camrys, these ten rides chosen by Jalopnik readers were the slowest sports cars the world had ever seen.

  • "High performance" and "fuel efficient" need not be mutually exclusive terms, thanks to some truly quick cars that get surprisingly respectable mileage.

  • One of the most widely accepted bits of advice you’ll find presented in practically every consumer magazine as Wisdom From Upon High is a bad idea.