Search

SEDAN BUYING GUIDE

The 7 best big sedans for the money

Times are tough—and so are our roads. But fear not. The oversize sedan may seem like a historical footnote, but there are plenty of contemporary cruisers that can glide across pavement and won't cost you a fortune. We picked apart seven of these posh rides to discover which is the best sedan for your buck.

Toyota Avalon


$33,195; 121.3 cubic feet; $273.66 per cubic foot


If you've driven an Avalon, you know what it is—a Lexus minus the Lexus name. While the car is decidedly expensive, it drives expensive. And in this price class, the Avalon is pretty tough to touch, with its roominess, supremely quiet interior, and superb fit and finish. It's a big car with the smoothest engine of any on our list, save the Ford Taurus, and a ride that errs on the soft side, but never to the detriment of safety. You probably won't find yourself rallying it around curves like we did—you know, just to make sure that it could (check)—but if you have to hustle it past a surging flow of cars in the merge lane, the 268-hp V6 steams up nicely.

Inside, where it counts, the Avalon is due for a refresh (probably coming for spring), but nothing is radically amiss. The seats are huge and supportive, and only the Chrysler 300 can best the Avalon's front shoulder room (it's nearly a tie, at 59.4 inches for the Toyota and 59.5 for the Chrysler). The Avalon has the best rear shoulder room of the lot and the best rear legroom, as well. The big Toyota gets 20 mpg in the city; of the other V6s, only the Hyundai Azera can match that mileage.

Buick LaCrosse

$29,960; 112.6 cubic feet; $266.07 per cubic foot

The LaCrosse is expensive for its interior size, which is the smallest of any car on this list. It is a poised car and the only hybrid in this mix (the hybrid is the base model for the 2012 Lacrosse), which gives it a best-in-class fuel economy of 25 city/36 highway, and at a better horsepower rating than the VW Passat (182 hp versus 170 hp). Volkswagen might counter that its diesel Passat gets better fuel economy than the hybrid LaCrosse, but the diesel VW's price-to-cubic foot ratio climbs to $220.48—still slightly below the Buick's, but not by as much. (More on the Passat coming up.)

Mileage aside, this Buick is far more stable than your grandpappy's car with the Landau roof. It's not exactly a Porsche 911, but that's not what you'd want from a long-mileage cruiser anyway. The problem with the LaCrosse is that, while it's large enough to be compared with the big sedans, it simply can't match up. The Buick has the least amount of front headroom and the worst scores for rear hip, shoulder, and headroom. It also has the smallest trunk. Don't get us wrong—the Buick is a nice car that comes with an extra year and 50,000 miles to its warranty (everything else on this list is at 3 years/36,000 miles). But it's designed to spar with Toyota Camrys, Ford Fusions, and Honda Accords.

Chrysler 300
$27,170; 122.3 cubic feet; $222.15 per cubic foot

This Chrysler is huge. It's only a hair away from being the biggest car here. But frankly, it's much more expensive than it should be. The finish quality is decidedly lower than average for this class, with lots of sloppy details such as loose padding in the trunk, visible hardware and wiring harnesses—lots of stuff to remind you of the bad old days of Detroit and why you went the import route.

The 300 is a solid driving machine that obliterates highway miles as easily as any car in the lot, but you don't get the comfort of the Avalon, the German attitude of the Passat, or the clean trim and modern design of the Taurus. Plus, the standard 300 brings a five-speed transmission to a battle of six-speeds. That wouldn't be a big deal if you opted for the V8 that Chrysler offers, which overcomes everything with horsepower. But we're comparing the base versions, and this five-speed seems to always overshift on windy roads and never downshift when you need it to. Manually overriding is an option, but it is plagued by delays. The lighting that's reminiscent of a microwave oven and the cheap-feeling controls and dials remind us of the fine work Chrysler has already done with some of its Jeep and Ram products and make us wish the engineers would turn their attention to the 300 next.

Dodge Charger

$25,495; 120.1 cubic feet; $212.28 per cubic foot

There's no question that the Charger feels more up-to-date than the 300, but this is as much veneer as it is actual revamp. The standard Charger packs a V6, and while the V6 versions of the Chevy Camaro and Ford Mustang are fine muscle cars in their own right, the Charger without a V8 just begs to be teased as a rental. It's not that the six is a bad engine; it delivers decent—though not ultra-refined—performance. It's that the Charger's exterior and history promise more. Everyone will want to know if your mean-looking car has the mustard to back it up, and the V6 is always going to feel like a cop-out.

Layer on the same kinds of demerits we've applied to the 300 and the Charger is a tough sell. Then again, the price isn't bad for the amount of space you get. And like the 300, the Dodge gobbles highway miles like they aren't even there.

Ford Taurus
$25,555; 122.4 cubic feet; $208.78 per cubic foot

The Taurus is a darn nice car. It's got a solid ride, a somewhat higher seating position than you'd expect in a sedan (almost crossover altitude), a rocket-smooth V6 that's quick to rev, and a slick interior that's as nice as Toyota's and more modern and stylish to boot. Its trunk is enormous (20.1 cubic feet versus 15 to 16 for the rest of the group), and it finishes either at the front or solidly mid-pack for every interior-space index except one: rear legroom. The Taurus has 38.1 inches, which is tolerable but the worst (in a tie) in this lineup.

The Ford is also the only car in this class that can be had with AWD, which you can get without cracking the $30,000 mark. For drivers in snow country, this makes the Taurus a great deal compared with anything else in this contest. We wish it offered better fuel economy than 18 city/28 highway, but at 4,015 pounds this is one heavy car—nearly 700 pounds heavier than the Passat.

Hyundai Azera

$25,495; 123.5 cubic feet; $206.4 per cubic foot

The Azera and the Taurus are nearly identical on price. On interior space, the Azera's the winner by a nose, and it really feels large on the inside. (We know some livery cab drivers are sorry to see the Crown Vic go, and this is a front-wheel rather than rear-wheel driver, but you'd have to think this Hyundai makes sense for that crew.) This car has the best headroom by far and the most front legroom in this group—there's two more inches of legroom than in a Chevy Suburban! The Azera ties the Taurus for worst rear-seat legroom, but, as we noted with the Ford, 38 inches is still decent.

We like the Azera, but it could stand a few upgrades. The trim seems cheap, and the 3.3-liter V6 engine, while potent, isn't as smooth as what's in the latest Hyundais and Kias. With an Azera update coming in just a few months, all of this is probably on Hyundai's radar. The Azera could get a more polished interior like that of the redesigned Hyundai Genesis, and it may see a much more refined, directly injected 3.0-liter V6, which is what this car has in Korea. If these updates come to fruition, then the Azera—already a nice car—probably becomes a slam dunk to win this segment.

VW Passat
$22,690; 117.9 cubic feet; $192.45 per cubic foot

Not only is the Tennessee-made Passat the most car for the buck, but it's also got a ton going for it. You get a big, quiet cockpit, for one thing. Euro-snobs will say it's a watered-down version of the smaller Passat sold only in Europe, but when dealing with blighted roads, you don't want the puny Passat; you want the one with broad shoulders! Not that it's flawless—not by a long shot. The five-pot motor is our least favorite VW engine since the air-cooled ones of yore... Well, OK, it's not that bad, but it's coarse and slow to wind up, and it reminds us that we'd much rather have the far smoother 2.0-liter four or even the narrow-angle six.

Actually, the way to go is to get the aforementioned diesel (yep, now you're at $25k) and its 31/43 mpg—along with torque that's the same as, or better than, anything else in this class. Mate it with a manual six-speed and you'll have a very big interior (pretty much on par with every other car in the class) plus some sporty character that is rare among sedans. Equipped in this manner, the Passat is still no Autobahn-bombing, buttoned-down Audi, but it's taut enough. Asking for more is asking for another breed of car, and that's not what big-car buyers want.

 

608 comments

  • jerry b  •  6 months ago
    I find it amusing that they post a $27000 price tag on the Chrysler 300, then show a $40K + version of it.
    • Sniffy 6 months ago
      Even better they refer to the 5 speed automatic. The 2012 3.6L V6 uses an 8 speed automatic transmission. The 2012 Chrysler 300 has also won in almost every head to head comparison. Sounds like this article was written by someone thumbing through old issues or Motor Trend.
    • Roma & Manoj 6 months ago
      This is typical sales F#$%
    • Steve 6 months ago
      They list the base model prices with nothing in them.
  • JimR  •  6 months ago
    Hmmmm... I remember when the Ford Taurus was considered a mid-sized car and Crown Vic was the full size...... My how times have changed.
    • THOMAS 6 months ago
      My old Taurus gave me 225,000 wonderful miles
    • c'sfan 6 months ago
      not considered, Tausus got alot bigger in redesign a couple of years ago.
    • Chupallama 6 months ago
      The Taurus replaced the 500 in 08 and the Fusion moved into the old midsized slot. We have a 2008 model, and it is a great freeway and highway cruiser.
  • Dan August  •  7 months ago
    A "BIG" car? A '75 Chrysler New Yorker was a BIG car, these are midsized.
    • Marlin 7 months ago
      We are talking about today. The last of the big american hoopties are doomed next year.
    • Jebas Roblox 7 months ago
      All the HUGE cars are gone. This is what the big car is. Get outa da 70's.
    • Kevin 6 months ago
      Not even mid-sized. They're about the same size as a mid-70's Nova which was listed as a "compact" at the time.
  • Hill449  •  6 months ago
    In high school (80's) I had a '74 Lincoln Towncar. We got nine of us in and everybody had a seat - 5 in the back and 4 in the front. Of course we were skinnier back then. THAT was a full-sized car!
    • Anna 6 months ago
      Yeh, that was a full size car!!!!!!
    • Avis 6 months ago
      There's still a lot of room in the Lincoln. I have a 2000, and runs great. Speak for yourself girlfriend, I was only about 60 pounds skinnier then. Of course, then for me was the 60;s.
    • KCrownfield 6 months ago
      go on the serious diet people!
  • Bill  •  6 months ago
    Who the F#&@ buys a car based on price per cubic foot ?
    • Tames 6 months ago
      seriously
    • Calling BS 6 months ago
      Really! Why not use a better metric...like the CMI? The 'Chick Magnet Indicator'?
    • David 6 months ago
      I do! I also buy fruits and vegetables by their refraction of light measurements.
  • VaL  •  6 months ago
    these prices would break my bank
  • ProudLeo  •  6 months ago
    I would like to know Mr Frank's age, for I can only guess that he is not old enough to actually know what a big dedan really is. I am 62, and the autos shown in this article would be considered mid-sized by my generation.
  • M.G  •  6 months ago
    I'll take my '04 Crown Vic over these tin cans on wheels any day. And don't tell me my gas mileage is bad. I get 23 on the hwy and these new cars are rated at about 28, which means they actually get lower than that under real driving conditions.
  • BobD  •  6 months ago
    Such prices..To date myself , I bought a brand new 1966 GTO for $2697.00. Wish I had it now. LOL.
  • NAZI PELOSER  •  6 months ago
    "BIG SEDANS"???...so the Fusion is mid size???
  • David Asselin  •  6 months ago
    whatever you do don't by a chrysler sebring with the 2.7 liter engine they suck a just threw a rod and really am disappointed in chrysler/dodge....I remember when you could by a Dodge dart and the dam thing would run forever! Now a days the cars fall apart fast!
  • Booba K  •  6 months ago
    The tittle of this article in Yahoo reads "7 bargain full size cars". $33,195 is a "bargain" in the country where median household income is $45K and falling? What are you smoking, guys??????
  • CodeBlue  •  6 months ago
    The only full size cars on the list are the Avalon, Taurus, Charger and the 300. The prices you list for each are way cheaper than what you see on the window sticker. All of these mentioned cars are in excess of $35K when nicely equiped. If you get them loaded with options, which is what most people want, the Taurus is over $40K, along with the 300, and the Avalon is just under $40K at 39K. The Charger comes in at 38K. So this is very misleading when this is advertised the way you have it. The other cars mentioned here are NOT even close to full sized cars.
  • Sloop  •  6 months ago
    most comfortable and economic sedan for its size is the lincoln town car!
  • Tommy  •  6 months ago
    Price per cubic foot? Epic fail!
  • Joshua  •  6 months ago
    As a Chevrolet and Buick Sales Consultant I must point out that they are in error when they say the Taurus is the only car in this class to offer an AWD. The Buick Lacrosse mentioned in this article also is available in an AWD.
  • Peter  •  6 months ago
    old taurus= piece of crap, new taurus w/awd = one nice ride
  • Larry  •  7 months ago
    Months of reasearch and found my top of the line 03 lincoln TC with less than 50 k miles for less than $10,000. Average on highway if you keep your foot out of it 24-26 mpg. never less then 20 around town. There is a reason the limo and taxis have run these for 300K+ miles. Love this car.
  • Dallas  •  6 months ago
    Give me that 2012 Ford Taurus, made by Ford Americans - they stayed afloat without taking bailout monies. GO Ford= t
  • DC  •  6 months ago
    these are not truly "big" cars. my dad's old '81 ford ltd crown victoria was huuuuge! then again it got only 13mpg hwy.

Top Rated

Category: Sedans

RESEARCH A CAR