Yahoo Autos Ram ProMaster EV First Drive Review: Electric, but still a very van-y van
As important as it is to get more electric options to regular consumers, the “mass market” is still only a portion of the vehicles on the road. Commercial vehicles, including vans and trucks, are sold in staggering numbers, many of which spend much of their time around town, running goods and equipment to local homes and businesses. Those are the least efficient routes you can pick for an internal combustion vehicle, which is bad for both the bottom line and the environment. Going electric therefore makes a lot of sense, but to date, the only electric commercial van was the Ford E-Transit. Well, it’s now being joined by the Ram ProMaster EV. It’s easily the nicest version to drive, and has specs that could make it a tempting alternative to the Ford. “Tempting” is not the same as “good,” however, as the Promaster EV is simply priced too high.
The Ram ProMaster EV is not actually the first version of this van to be electrified. You see, the ProMaster is but one badge-engineered take on a commercial vehicle available throughout the Stellantis empire. In fact, way back in 2020, Peugeot was the first to reveal an electric version of what it calls the Boxer (the E-Boxer), while the Fiat E-Ducato debuted a few years after. They are not all the same, however. Of the two vans, the ProMaster EV mirrors the Peugeot with a higher-output motor under the snub nose powering the front wheels. It produces 268 horsepower and 302 pound-feet of torque. That’s only down 8 hp to the Pentastar V6-powered ProMaster, and up 50 pound-feet of torque. That output is also right in line with the Ford, which sits at 266 horsepower and 317 pound-feet of torque, though the Ford sends its power to the rear wheels rather than the front. Something to consider for those in the Snow Belt.
Backing the ProMaster’s motor is 110-kilowatt-hours of battery capacity, which is also the same as the Peugeot. It’s the sole battery option, and Ram is targeting a maximum city range of 174 miles, though it said it expects a little more than 160 miles with the van loaded to half its payload capacity. Range estimates are also based on American test cycles (the Peugeot and Fiat quote the extremely optimistic WLTP test methodology, so there’s no accurate comparison to be had). More importantly, the ProMaster EV tops the Ford’s 89-kWh battery pack and maximum range estimate of 159 miles for the low-roof cargo van.
Maximum fast-charging speed is 150 kilowatts, but it seems more likely that businesses would recharge in the evening. (If they routinely need more than the ProMaster EV’s stated range in a day, an EV probably isn’t the best bet at this time.) As such, it is capable of 11-kW Level 2 AC charging, which is what you can expect from the typical “home” charger.
There will be two versions of the ProMaster EV available. The delivery van, which will be the first, is a high-roof van that differs mainly in the addition of a roll-up rear cargo door, and a sliding pocket door behind the front passenger door. These are added to provide easy ingress and egress to the cargo area without requiring clearance to open doors. The other, more conventional cargo van variant coming later next year is also a high-roof van, but with more typical split rear doors and a normal sliding van door behind the passenger door. Perhaps the biggest difference between the two is payload: 2,030 pounds for the delivery van and 3,020 for the cargo van. For comparison sake, cargo E-Transits range from 2,799 to 3,249 pounds, depending on wheelbase and roof height, and the chassis-cab and cutaway models are rated higher (though that’s also to accommodate whatever custom box would be fitted). Ram claims up to 524 cubic feet of space, though it didn’t specify whether it was the delivery or cargo model, versus up to 536 cubic feet with Ford’s high-roof E-Transit. It should also be said that the ProMaster has the exact same cargo capacity as the gas-powered version since the battery pack is under the floor.
