Search

Cheapest Cars to Own

On Kiplinger's value scale, the Honda Accord is the clear winner over the Toyota Camry.

So you want to cut the cost of your commute. If you're looking to save money with a gas sipper, don't stop at the sticker price and fuel economy. Other ownership expenses -- from repairs and maintenance to depreciation and insurance -- can push up what you actually spend by hundreds of dollars a year.

We asked Vincentric, an automotive data firm, for a list of vehicles with the lowest five-year ownership costs in four categories. The data include all of the costs listed above, plus taxes and financing. Then we compared those vehicles with ones that did well in Kiplinger's ranking system -- considering performance, safety and value -- to determine the best bang for your buck.

2011 Nissan Sentra2011 Nissan SentraCompact sedans. You can't find a cheaper car to own than the base-level, manual transmission Nissan Versa ($10,750). But in exchange for paying only $27,028 over five years, you get a car without air conditioning, anti-lock brakes or even a radio. We think a better choice is the sporty Nissan Sentra SR ($18,530). Despite an $8,000 difference upfront, the five-year ownership cost is only about $4,000 more. (The ownership cost assumes you are paying 5.6% interest on a five-year loan but that you recoup the cost of the car, minus depreciation, when you sell the vehicle after five years.) The Sentra boasts a full complement of safety equipment -- ABS, stability control, traction control and six airbags -- and has a 60/40 split folding rear seat. Plus, you can get an automatic transmission at no extra charge. The Sentra has more power than the Versa but gets about the same fuel economy (30 miles per gallon in combined city and highway driving).

Midsize sedans. The base model Toyota Camry ($21,630) is the cheapest midsize sedan to own, with a five-year cost of $34,388. It's comfortable enough, but its handling is lackluster and the interior is frumpy. On Kiplinger's value scale, the Honda Accord LX ($22,730) is the clear winner over the Camry. Its five-year cost is $1,236 more, but the Accord gets a five-star overall safety rating from the government versus four stars for the Camry, and its four-cylinder engine is more powerful and gets better mileage (27 mpg overall). Spot-on handling and a larger interior give it a boost, too.

Luxury sedans. Lexus's most recent entry in its hybrid series, the CT 200h ($29,995), has a five-year ownership cost of about $44,400. That is the lowest of the luxury class, partly because the CT 200h gets a thrifty 42 mpg overall. The downside: Both power and space leave much to be desired.

To find an entry-luxury vehicle that did well in our rankings, we had to move up the list to the Audi A4 2.0T ($33,175). It doesn't have the green cred of the CT 200h, but it gets our vote for value -- even with a five-year ownership cost of $51,217. The four-cylinder engine puts out 211 horses but manages 25 mpg combined. Legroom, headroom and cargo space are decent for a compact car, and resale value is 46% after three years.

2011 Toyota Venza2011 Toyota VenzaFamily crossovers. When it comes to holding a couple of kids and luggage, most of the midsize and large crossovers get the job done. And the Toyota Venza ($27,385) has the lowest five-year ownership cost in the segment: $38,733. Its four-cylinder engine gets an overall 23 mpg, making it a fine choice if fuel economy is your top goal. But its 182-horsepower engine lacks zip, and its handling feels less than precise.

If you want more power, more room and a better driving experience, consider Kiplinger's Best in Class winner for 2011, the Mazda CX-9 Sport ($29,930).

It seats seven, and it has three-zone climate control to keep everyone comfortable. The V6 puts out 273 horses, with about average fuel economy for the segment, at 19 mpg overall. The CX-9 offers nearly 50 cubic feet of cargo space with the third row folded, and more than most sedans with it up. Over five years, the ownership cost is $45,383.
 
 
Top Locations Orem

995 comments

  • trtx  •  9 months ago
    Car as appliance instead of kid's toy. When I was young my cars had to be exciting, now that I'm in my fifties I want reliability, comfort and value. I drove a Camry as a company car the last three years, 150k miles. Don't go on about the interior being 'frumpy'-which it's not. It was comfortable, ergonomic, spacious, and quiet. Never broke down in those 150k miles. My personal car is a Corolla. Not exciting, but with the same qualities. I've always been a car nut, but when are some of these writers going to grow up?
  • Moe  •  Orem, Utah  •  1 month 27 days ago
    I like the hatchbacks. I usually buy used cars instead of new. I use the Internet to find online deals . On occasion, I have bought new cars, but only if I can get a scoring deal on it. I do like used cars because you don't have to be super protective of it because it is already worn in.
  • AmbroseBierce  •  7 months ago
    Do people still buy luxury sedans?
    What about hatchbacks, like the Volkswagen Golf?
  • virginia  •  7 months ago
    The Nissan Versa is a lot of bang for the buck. It is roomy, very comfortable and very snappy on the road. The mpg is also excellent. Heard they were hard to find due to their popularity.
  • Killah716  •  7 months ago
    In addition, the Venza by Toyota having a lower price point is a no-brainer over the Mazda cx-9 product. I have owned a lot of new vehicles and Toyota products far out-preform the domestic brands in actual gas mileage, dependability, maintenance costs, etc. over the long haul. I bought nothing but Fords for about 8 years and they would have small but annoying problems, including car stereo not working properly in my new 2004 focus, the hatch-back never closing right in that sam car, and it has sounded like a go-kart engine running, instead of a new vehicle since I purchased it. I traded in both a ranger and an f150 at about the 60k marker, because water would pour in to the sliding glass rear window on the ranger and the f150 had brake mechanism problems and well as it riding really rough, even on new tires. You could feel everything in the road in the f150. After trading a 2010 challenger in on a 2011 Tundra V6, we were very satisfied. The Challenger V8 Hemi had design flaws and the transmission was the reason we got rid of it after owning for only one year. Guess my parents were right in the early 90's to give up wasting money on domestic and it's money-pits being produced and started buying hondas, toyotas and nissans. I have tried to put money back into our economy here, but domestic car manufacturers are making reallllly hard to do just that.
  • Killah716  •  7 months ago
    FIRST OF ALL, ONLY BUY NEW and only IN SEPT/OCT. THE DEALERS MAKE THEIR BEST PRICE CUTS AT THIS TIME OF YEAR TO CLEAR OUT THAT YEARS' MODELS. If you aren't getting 0%-3.5% financing from the dealer on new, shop the outside banks for the very best rate. Buying used right now is a HUGE mistake. You will end up having a payment that is similar or more than that of a new car, due to simple supply and demand of used cars and their way higher apr's that come with financing them. Most inportantly, you are in control at the dealer, always. Never buy the first car, with the first terms that you see. Shop the same brand's dealerships!
  • Paul  •  7 months ago
    This article ignore some of the best built cars in the world - Ford Fusion, Chevy Cruize and Hyundai Accent.These cars are economical, fun to drive and very affordable to maintain. Does anyone here have a drawing board?
  • Just B  •  8 months ago
    "CHEAP" new cars? I didn't think $40,000 was such a great deal until I realized I only make $32,000 a yr... Then, by the time I own it in 5 yrs, it has already lost 3/4 of its value I paid for it! YEAH!! NEW CARS ARE CHEAPER. Why buy used? When you could get the same car 2 yrs older w/ more miles for a discount?

    Honestly, who "agrees"?
  • Happy  •  8 months ago
    Cheapest "new" car i ever owned is the '04 Dodge Neon M/T i still have ($11,500 new) Now at 150K, i do all the preventive maintenance ahead of schedule and it looks and runs fine. If i had a job and i needed a new ride again i 'd opt for the Nissan Versa Sedan M/T with A/C for $12K. My 2nd car is a '74 Plymouth Valiant with the original slant 6, auto transmission. Yes, it squeaks, grunts and moans but it's never been rebuilt and it still runs well too. People laugh when i take it to a car show. That's OK; i laugh too when i park it next to a $50K plus "restored" car.
  • old guy  •  7 months ago
    NOT interested in cheap-Inexpensive is what interests me.Of the cars that I have owned most
    have been US.The two worst were a Chevette and an early Honda Accord.I will get a lot of flack for the latter but it had a bad engine(rebuilt under warranty) .it was a rust bucket. even the frame around the rear vent windows rusted out.the dash fell out not the dash board but the whole dash came loose.These problems could have been due to trying to exceed production capacity but
    it was NOT a good car.I now have 1998 GMC k1500 with over 150k,a 2000 Jeep Cherokee Sport with 119k and a 2007 Dodge Caravan with 56k.None are CHEAP but all are relatively INEXPENSIVE requiring little more that regular maintenance.
  • Nghi Nguyen  •  8 months ago
    Don't forget Toyota Corrola,this should be the besr car for the money.
  • Lou  •  8 months ago
    I bought an 09 Versa Hatchback with the important options that make this car fun to drive and much more flexible than any sedan. You will spend much less than a similarly appointed Sentra.
  • gerri  •  8 months ago
    Its funny how everyone shifted the entire article to who makes the best car(s). Its about the "cheapest car" over a 5 year period. If you look at the BRAND and the PRICES in each category the article make logical sense. Mainly due to the fact that just about every "Automaker" has a car for each of the categories that where listed. i.e. (Midsize sedans. The base model Toyota Camry ($21,630) is the cheapest midsize sedan to own, with a five-year cost of $34,388). So on AVERAGE THAT car is the CHEAPEST for that category. It doesn't factor in if you blow the motor from the fact you drive like your on a NASCAR raceway or that you hit a tree. Now we all know that the Toyota Camry is a great, awesome, super duper car, but not all Toyota's are the best.
  • William Thiedeman  •  8 months ago
    Have never owned a new set of wheels in over 60 years driving. They usually have over 50,000 miles at purchase. First owner gets "bugs out". First scratch isn't the first. Don't part until well past 175,000. Secrets - prevenitive maintenance. No jack rabbit starts, rushing to a stop and sharp turns. Makes for maximum tire and brake mileage/life. Makes for best AVG MPG.
  • Ellen  •  8 months ago
    My Honda Accord did not turn out to be as reliable as I thought. At $160,000 miles I had a head gasket leak and other leaks of oil. Cost me $1200. Then a new starter at 166,000 miles. Overall, I don't know if that is excessive but the starter and brakes cost me $700. I have put a lot of money into this car and the windows are not aligned, the radio works but no longer illuminates. The Cd player no longer works. Did I mention that this car is a 2003. The window swiches do not work on one of the rear windows. So I am unsure of another Accord.
  • One day it will all make ...  •  8 months ago
    rice burners - really wouldn't surprise me if 90% of rice burner buyers are democrats which is code for socialism and if you have to ask, it's about YOU
    • JT 2 months ago
      Please what does this article have to do with politics stay on topic.
  • rayken  •  10 months ago
    I believe many years ago a diesel engine VW rabbit got somewhere close to 50mpg>
    • Alfred 10 months ago
      My 1985 Honda CRX, HF model promised 50 MPG and delivered 50 MPG.
    • Peter B 10 months ago
      That diesel Rabbit belched more black smoke than a B-52!
    • Ken Smith 8 months ago
      Black smoke only when kicking it in at some what low rpm. I have owned 3 and got 50 ...or near 50 mpg on the highway. non-turbocharged.
  • Harry Poppie  •  10 months ago
    we have the best governmet money can buy.
  • Alfred  •  10 months ago
    So, where is Chevrolet's 2012 Sonic?
    • Plyford 8 months ago
      A very good question. I went looking to buy one, last week, and found only a single one at a nearby Chevy dealer. It was for display only, not for sale. The salesman told me they have no idea as to when they'll have any to sell.
  • luna_lady2003@yahoo.com  •  10 months ago
    maybe we should all ride bikes

Follow Yahoo! Autos

RESEARCH A CAR

Top Rated

Category: Sedans

More Articles

  • Most improved cars 2012 Marco R. della Cava

    Total Car Score recently released a list of Most Improved Cars for 2012, highlighting eight redesigned automobiles whose improvements helped the models’ scores jump significantly over 2011.

  • Memorial Day means many things to Americans: An opportunity to remember those who've died in service of their country. A chance to get together with friends and relatives. Cookouts. Picnics. Box socials. (They still have those, right?)

  • Take one look at these purpose-built sports cars and you'd expect them to be fast. You would be wrong. Even before we got used to powerful V6 Camrys, these ten rides chosen by Jalopnik readers were the slowest sports cars the world had ever seen.

  • "High performance" and "fuel efficient" need not be mutually exclusive terms, thanks to some truly quick cars that get surprisingly respectable mileage.

  • One of the most widely accepted bits of advice you’ll find presented in practically every consumer magazine as Wisdom From Upon High is a bad idea.