Search

Driving the world's only electric-powered Rolls-Royce

The maker of luxury cars for the world's wealthy asks if they want a greener alternative

 

Since her first appearance in 1911, the Spirit of Ecstasy figurine heralding every Rolls-Royce has spread her cape on clouds of carbon dioxide. Except in this car — the Rolls-Royce 102EX, whose wardrobe-sized bonnet covers a 1,411-lb box of batteries. It’s everything right, and wrong, with driving on electricity.

This isn’t a prototype, and Rolls-Royce has no immediate plans to rip the 6.75-liter V-12s from the Phantom-driving chauffeurs hauling the world’s grandees anytime soon. Instead, the 102EX serves as a rolling customer clinic for Rolls-Royce and parent BMW, which have shipped the 102EX around the world over the past 10 months, asking wealthy customers for suggestions of how to navigate an ever-warming world.

While Rolls-Royce and other carmakers of its ilk represent the world’s wealth, as automakers go they’re almost proletarian. Making money in cars requires engineering and building one set of parts that can be sold several million times over, spreading overhead costs as thinly as possible. Last year, Rolls-Royce sold 2,711 cars worldwide. Ford sells that many F-Series pickups in the United States every 36 hours.

Yet as the demands for more efficient technology grows, from both customers and government regulators worldwide, Rolls-Royce can no longer afford to sell big but outdated gasoline engines as it once did. U.S. regulations will gradually require Rolls-Royce to improve the 14 mpg average its models sport here, and European and Asian rules for carbon emissions from cars are even tougher. Plus, Rolls-Royce customers give  diesel engines the same regard Queen Elizabeth would give a brown-bag lunch.

That leaves electricity as the final frontier.

The battery pack in the 102EX is the largest ever fitted to a passenger car, with 71 kWh of energy — about as much as a typical American house would use to stay warm on a winter day. It drives a pair of 145kw electric motors at the rear axle, which can recapture some of the car’s rolling energy under braking to recharge the battery. Compared to the V-12, the system produces less horsepower and a slightly slower march to 60 mph, but it has more torque, all of it available with the tap of a chauffeur’s boot.

Driving through downtown Washington, the benefits of luxury electric motoring emerge from the moment you push the start button, nestled in a dash of aluminum fiber and leather tanned with chestnut oil. The noiseless motion makes the cabin of the 102EX as hushed as a manor’s drawing room. The 102EX weighs three tons, but only about 400 pounds more than a regular Phantom, with a suspension that hushes the chatter of city pavement. The battery system shifts its center of gravity closer to Earth, allowing the Rolls to gracefully carve around scenery like Pavarotti in “Tosca.”

Removing the engine gave Rolls liberty to make some improvements, like a flat floor for the rear where most owners ride, but also posed several engineering bogeys. Systems that use to run off spare engine power now require electric connections, including the dread numbness of electric power steering. The heating system uses two water-filled kettles wrapped in coils to generate heat for the cabin. (I did ask if it could be adapted to make tea, like the African Queen did for Humphrey Bogart. This may be the last Rolls I get to drive for some time.)

Despite the strength of its first impression, the downside emerges the longer you linger. The air-cooled batteries of the 102EX provide a range of only 125 miles, with a sizable deviation based on climate; owners in Dubai would go further, while those in Minsk would stick close to home in winter. Using the fastest chargers available in Europe, the 102EX can be recharged in 8 hours. If you tried to plug it into a U.S. wall outlet, your charge time would be somewhere just beyond 30 hours, or roughly 2,000 F-Series sales.

Even though a regular Phantom starts at $400,000 before customizations, electric power carries a steep charge. Assuming Rolls-Royce could build a production version of the 102EX and piggyback on BMW for a low-cost contract, the batteries in a 102EX would cost at least $36,000.

Yet the 102EX makes sense. Big, expensive cars can better handle the shortcomings of electric power than everyday models. Rolls-Royces typically drive only a few thousand miles a year; that limits any environmental benefit, but also takes care of range anxiety. Making an EV for the world’s elite could help push the technology into more affordable and useful forms -- especially since many buyers capable of owning an electric Rolls-Royce derive their wealth from oil. It’s an idea strong enough to leave one’s spirit mildly ecstatic.

 

69 comments

  • Paul R  •  6 months ago
    This is a stunning article in that it was informative, well-written and witty without being smarmy. Nothing special about that really, but it is when it is posted by a Yahoo! staff writer. Well done, Mr. Hyde.
    • Jon 6 months ago
      Absolutely stunning Jebes. Although this staff writer seemed informed,unlike most of them.
    • J A 6 months ago
      Don't forget, there is pictures too!
  • OLAJIDE  •  6 months ago
    There should be alternative way of charging the battery while on motion
    • Juanito 6 months ago
      Yes my friend, there's a way to do that right now if only someone will listen to me. But I won't release the information not unless I will receive compensation in exchange. My designed if made, new owners requires only one initial charge and drive it as long as you want without worrying to have a dead battery again.
    • Rob 6 months ago
      We give up! Oh no! You don't mean a hybrid!? The range is too low as it stands. Or rolls. Haha! "I roll" in Latin = Volvo.
    • Peppermint Patty 6 months ago
      No. The Third Law of Thermodynamics says you lose energy constantly in such a system. Even if the Royce did nothing but sit in neutral, it would eventually run down from Joule heating losses in the power circuits. Juanito is blowing smoke - without energy being input from SOMEWHERE to replace what the motors and heating coils use, you have to recharge the batteries when all that energy is used up. I personally designed an RV which might (in the desert states) run continually with no recharging, but it would have a 17-kilowatt, house-sized solar array on its roof.
  • ERIC  •  6 months ago
    I have always long for this technology.... A car that runs on only electricity is just fabulous.....
    • pynaetlb 6 months ago
      And generating electricity doesn't effect the environment, right?
    • rick 6 months ago
      Pynaetlb is absolutely right. The only way to generate enough electricity to power a reasonable amount of cars is nuclear or burning more coal. Electricity is not free. Nor is it cheaply generated.
    • Jon 6 months ago
      And what is most electricity produced from ? Hydrocarbons.
  • dearvirg6  •  6 months ago
    I might just have to order one! Then I WAKE UP
    • Godiva 6 months ago
      Then U must still have a job, unlike the 15 million+ Americans who are still unemployed & riding bikes or walking...LOL!!!
  • 2million 4NoBirthCert  •  6 months ago
    I'll stick with a scooter.
  • opeyemi  •  6 months ago
    the new R,R. thats is good we can now boost of alternative for crude oil. sorry for the nations whose there primary income based on oil.
    • I must be Daffy! 6 months ago
      It is a Ford (found on road dead). Nothing else to say.
    • Jon 6 months ago
      And what do we make plastics from? What do we use to make electricity in most places? Hydrocarbons.Oils not going away, I hate to tell you.
    • Jon 6 months ago
      Daffy Ford didnt need to be bailed out.Than again neither did GM and Mopar. They should have went under.
  • hollander  •  6 months ago
    If you can afford this you can also afford a Volt or Prius for longer trips. Why not? I would love to be able to have one.
  • Logikal  •  6 months ago
    Only someone with more cash than common sense would buy a car that can only go 125 miles when fully-powered and takes 30 hrs to re-charge. Maybe they can use the trunk (is there one?) to store 200 large Eveready's in case they run out of power while shopping on Rodeo Dr. At over 400G's for such a headache this is an exemplary case for P.T. Barnum's famous "there's a sucker born every minute."
  • Shilorin  •  6 months ago
    I'm getting one as soon as..............
  • Thomas  •  6 months ago
    If you're in the market for an electric Rolls Royce then this is a "must buy" :P
  • PAT  •  6 months ago
    Granted I Love Rolls Royce.... But I'd rather own the Tesla.
  • 1 minute ago  •  6 months ago
    I guess a hybrid Rolls-Royce is out of the question?
  • Sean  •  6 months ago
    Im all for new ways of limiting our oil consumption but i cant be the only one who thinks rolls royce should be made without compromise. Electric powered motors on a rolls just see to "econo box" and I bet more people would prefer the big engines.
  • x  •  6 months ago
    It seems to me that some other type of alternative fuel would better fit cars that SHOULD NOT be constrained by limits imposed before "recharging" and long recharging period. Something along the lines of a Fuel Cell would be more appropriate for RR I think.

    But, there are other ways to greatly reduce our oil usage. Diesel engines are FAR more efficient than gas, but the EPA (yes, the EPA has caused a great many problems for people AND businesses in the US) has all but kept them from being widely accepted here in the US.
  • A Yahoo! User  •  6 months ago
    I drive my 1990 VW Vanagon only about a thousand mile a year. I certainly look down with barely concealed but well placed disgust on Rolls-Royce owners who need to drive a few thousand miles a year. The seamy underbelly of society, if you ask me.
  • Bill  •  6 months ago
    An electric Rolls is just wrong.
  • olajide  •  6 months ago
    I am in need of this car b4 December
  • Mike Zell  •  6 months ago
    While Mr Hyde can write a good article the idea of it is pathetic.
    Electric cars for people who can afford gasoline.
    Actually, after 1 second of thought and 2 seconds of research.
    There is enough oil n gas to last 990 years at the rate were using it.
    So stop freaking out people.
    Mike
  • jmaints  •  6 months ago
    i got two lol
  • Brian Otieno  •  6 months ago
    this is dope.waiting for top gear review.

Follow Yahoo! Autos

RESEARCH A CAR

Top Rated

Category: Sportscars

More Articles

  • Most improved cars 2012 Marco R. della Cava

    Total Car Score recently released a list of Most Improved Cars for 2012, highlighting eight redesigned automobiles whose improvements helped the models’ scores jump significantly over 2011.

  • Memorial Day means many things to Americans: An opportunity to remember those who've died in service of their country. A chance to get together with friends and relatives. Cookouts. Picnics. Box socials. (They still have those, right?)

  • Take one look at these purpose-built sports cars and you'd expect them to be fast. You would be wrong. Even before we got used to powerful V6 Camrys, these ten rides chosen by Jalopnik readers were the slowest sports cars the world had ever seen.

  • "High performance" and "fuel efficient" need not be mutually exclusive terms, thanks to some truly quick cars that get surprisingly respectable mileage.

  • One of the most widely accepted bits of advice you’ll find presented in practically every consumer magazine as Wisdom From Upon High is a bad idea.