Search

The Future of Performance Cars

When it comes to high-performance machinery, there has been no better time in the history of the automobile. From 1200-horsepower, multi-million-dollar Veyrons to $23,000, 300-horsepower/30-mpg muscle cars, we really do have it all.

But for how long? Are we at the peak of automotive performance, or just the beginning? We know the future of the automobile will keep getting greener, but where does that leave those who love rev-matched downshifts and the synchronized scream of pistons, cams, valves, and crank at wide-open throttle?  We surveyed the industry and asked several key experts to look 10 years into the future of high-performance cars. You'll be surprised at what they told us...

AUDI: WHEN DOES INTERNAL-COMBUSTION DIE?

"I will not be alive any more. And I hope I'm still living some time, but I'm convinced it will still be in existence. It will stay one of the best solutions, and not only for motorsport.'' -Dr. Wolfgang Ullrich, Head of Audi Motorsport

BMW: M5 UPS THE ANTE

BMW M5BMW M5The heart of any BMW M5 is its powerful engine. For the 2012 model, that means the same 4.4-liter twin-turbo V-8 that produces 555 horsepower and 500 pound-feet of torque that's already found in the X5M and X6M. To increase fuel efficiency 25 percent over the V-10 in the 2010 M5, which was rated at a mere 11/17 mpg, the 2012 model will use an automatic start-stop function in combination with a seven-speed dual-clutch transmission. An Active M differential will be employed to split power between the rear wheels, which should improve handling by over-driving the outer wheel in a turn. BMW assures us the M5 has large enough brakes to lap the Nürburgring right from the showroom. When it arrives next year, we will, of course, verify.

DODGE: A FUTURE WE CAN AFFORD

Dodge Charger SRT8Dodge Charger SRT8Anytime we've gone through a bit of an oil crisis, technology always bounces back. Everyone probably said the muscle car was dead 30 years ago, but it's actually in full force even stronger. So this year we start with the SRT8, with the first time it's had cylinder deactivation. I keep seeing technologies enabling performance, not being hindered by it. I see that happening... probably more radical swings in the ability to have, let's say, a 400-hp engine that gets 40 mpg as well. We're finding that multispeed transmissions are also a phenomenal thing that's just now starting, almost like the 20-speed bicycle back in the day, that's just now becoming more commonplace. That's a huge advantage -- having an engine that sleeps when it needs to, that performs. On top of that I see Porsche has already started to dabble in this space where you're using hybrid technology as a performance enhancer, not just for fuel economy. So I see the future being all about duality, having your cake and eating it too. Because everyone's going to need that intellectual alibi when they buy their next performance car in 10 years.

What will the SRT8 look like in 2021?

There will still be a handful of V-8s out there, but we're going to invest in fours and sixes. With the SRT, we've had turbo fours in the past. We're looking at active dampening, which we actually have today in the SRT8 Charger. So it's taking all these technologies that people associate with relatively exotic cars, and bringing it down to the Dodge customer, making it much more affordable. -Ralph Gilles, SRT Brand President/CEO; Chrysler Group Product Design Senior Vice President

FORD: WHAT ABOUT THE MUSTANG?

Ford Mustang Boss 302Ford Mustang Boss 302"Innovations in technology, including improvements in aerodynamics, lighter weight materials, and powertrain performance will definitely influence the design and function. The challenge for performance cars going forward is to continue to deliver the 'and' solution that we started with the 2011 Mustang.

Maintaining / improving power and performance while delivering outstanding fuel is a must and will ensure the sustainability of the brand. Mustang will continue to deliver on its promise while paving new ground into the future of high-performance vehicles." -Dave Pericak, Ford Mustang Chief Engineer

GM:
A DIFFERENT FORMULA

What will be the key performance-enabling technologies of the next decade?

To the extent that we can boost small-displacement engines, I think it's not just engine technology, because the power-to-weight ratio needs to be good. We have to do things in the industry relative to performance cars to really enable a different formula.

But I also think there are a lot of things yet to come on internal-combustion engines that will be helpful and enable that as well. So it's not over, but it will change, and it will change quite dramatically. The displacement and horsepower piece of that will only get better, in terms of how much we get out of lower displacements, but also it will move to lower displacements, and numbers of cylinders. Because we're going to go after the car -- with a vengeance. -Mark Reuss, General Motors North America President

JAGUAR: TAKING THE NEXT LEAP

Jaguar C-X75Jaguar C-X75Jaguar takes on the Porsche 918 on the road, if not the track, with its C-X75 hybrid supercar. It's set to take orders this fall, with deliveries beginning in late 2013. The vehicle's name will change, and Jaguar will build just 250 examples at a base price of $1.151 million or more, depending on the market and taxes, based on recent exchange rates.

A 1.6-liter, highly boosted gasoline internal-combustion engine with "not just one simple blower," according to Jaguar-Land Rover engineering director Bob Joyce, combines with two powerful electric motors and four-wheel drive to bring on a sub-3-second 0-60-mph time and sub-6-second 0-100-mph time, plus a top speed of more than 200 mph. All-electric range is up to 31 miles, and Jaguar's estimated CO2 emissions of less than 99 grams per kilometer comes to more than 55.2 mpg.

Will man's thirst for power ever be quenched?

"Where it's going to end up en masse, that's going to take time to find out, but I think it'll be a bit of everything. As far as internal-combustion engines, I think we'll still see V-8s, V-12s, V-6s, whatever they might be. But the jury's out and time will tell... "It's all about efficiency now. If you can get 500, 600, 700 horsepower out of a more efficient engine, then it will happen. When you think that 100 horsepower per liter was once a goal...we're talking 200, 250 horsepower per liter now. That's phenomenal! Man will always want to strive for faster, bigger, better...it's the natural human state." -Ian Callum, Jaguar Design Director

Pagination

(3 Pages) | Read all
 

348 comments

  • udaya ranjith Hettiarachc ...  •  9 months ago
    try to make hybried supercar
  • A Yahoo! User  •  9 months ago
    You want good performance AND gas mileage? Too bad...
    As long as you have that extra horsepower at your wheels, your gonna have the temptation to drive fast. Fast driving a.k.a "flooring it"=fuel consumption.
    You can get good gas mileage out of any car, just drive it at a constant speed (ex. my eclipse gt can get about 30mpg at 50-60 on the highway)
  • Vincit Omnia Veritas  •  10 months ago
    My 04 Nissan has 300 hp and gets almost 30 mpg.
    • Jimmy 10 months ago
      The only 2004 Nissan that had 300 horsepower were the Titan and Armada. Neither one got over 21 mpg, but good try.
    • Vincit Omnia Veritas 10 months ago
      350z
    • SierraG 10 months ago
      the 2004 Nissan 350z had 287 horsepower and gets about 24-26 mpg
  • Michael  •  10 months ago
    Why is the Toyota Supra being turned into a Scion. One of the worlds best supercars given to a generic car company.
    • JustinStrife 10 months ago
      The Supra is not being turned into a Scion. Did you even read the article? The new Scion is bringing back some of the heritage from the old AE86 GT-S.
  • Randy  •  10 months ago
    What I want to know is which car is the $23,000, 300-horsepower/30-mpg muscle car they mentioned...I'd look into that one...just sayin'
    • Manuel1001 10 months ago
      i bought a 2010 chevy camaro V6 stick shift , for $22,500 . 304 hp and about 27 mpg is what it's gettin me ,not exactly to description but close , oh and i love da hell out of it
    • Solution 10 months ago
      The base Mustang MSRP $22,310 is rated 305 hp @ 31mpg.
      I'm pretty sure the author was thinking of the Mustang or Camaro when he wrote 300hp/30mpg @$23K
    • SDsurfer 10 months ago
      manuel, you bought a V6 camaro? haha wow..
  • uNCeen  •  10 months ago
    In my '09 Vette I get 34 mpg on cruise control at 75 mph on the freeway with the top off. If you drive it conservatively it is really a fuel efficient car that can jump out of the gate when needed.
    Making cars more fuel efficient is great but we need to go about it wisely. Take Ethanol it is supposed to be better for the environment but it is causing food shortages, damaging engines and reducing fuel economy.
    • fly 10 months ago
      When do you need to "jump out of the gate"? Are you racing on the road?
    • Christian 10 months ago
      75 mph on the freeway with the top off? Dude... you have to check your numbers... there is no way your math adds up. GM will pay you millions of dollars to look at your car if you can pull off 75 mph (unless you are talking about going down a mountain on neutral with the engine idle... and even then probably not...)
    • Eggy 10 months ago
      ^ idiot.
  • Abner  •  10 months ago
    What the hell happened to flying cars?
    • MarcD 10 months ago
      You should try driving around here. We see them all the time. Not intentional, but the drivers are REALLY idiots.
    • hvymtlgds 10 months ago
      Yeah didn't you see the dude in the trans am that passed the cop driving faster than the century mark? He flew into the overpass literally. ( watch tru tv)
    • Pat Riot 10 months ago
      Too expensive.
  • Larry  •  10 months ago
    I have a 2002 Z06 Corvette that get's (on cruise control at 55) almost... not quite 30 MPG.It is the best fuel mileage car I own. The way I usually drive though it cancels about a half dozen Prius's.
  • Mackenzie2148  •  10 months ago
    What's the point of building a 555 hp M-5, then electronically limiting its top speed to 155 mph? Makes no sense to me. BMW needs to kick the lawyers of their design team.
  • jetstar88  •  10 months ago
    I'll settle for a 1993 5.0 GT. something I can actually tame. with no traction control or electronically limited BS and that is not a nightmare to work on.
  • momof4  •  10 months ago
    I still love the older muscle cars!
  • Doug  •  10 months ago
    On the interstate speed limit is , 55 to 70 and you have a car that run a 150 mph. What to do hummmmm
  • Andrew  •  10 months ago
    This is the stupidest thing that has happened in the world of super-cars. These "high performance" vehicles were not, are not, and should not be made for "fuel efficiency". The whole point of having a super-car is for the thrill and for the fun and for the ridiculousness. Huge engines that gobble up high quality gasoline to create the roar of a super-car IS part of the fun. A hybrid? Adding weight? Taking away gas guzzling horsepower? reducing engine size? That is absolutely ridiculous. Taking away a V-8 engine? If anyone remembers (or in my case has read about) when the first V-8 engine was put in a super-car, there was a new high-standard set. Sure now that technology is moving ahead so should the cars yada yada yada. Well in my opinion, (which shouldn't matter to super-car companies since I don't have the money to buy their creations) super-cars should continue to be made for their ridiculous noises, engines, and gas mileage because that it why super-car are so super.

    Also if your willing (or able) to spend so much on a car, gas mileage should not be a concern to you.

    My predictions is that those men who buy super-cars will be all happy that they now have achieved good gas mileage and the environment has been saved or whatever, but fans like me will be disappointed that super-cars are becoming less and less "super".
  • glen  •  10 months ago
    I don't understand something. When these electric cars pull into the "electric station" for a "fill-up", exactly where do these stations get their power from---electrical generating plants, wood, coal, natural gas---where is the loss of emissions?
  • Big Wave  •  10 months ago
    I used to own Ford muscle cars in the 60's and into the 70's. The exhaust sounds and engine vibration shook the whole car. The TORQUE, just wrestling the wheel. It could pass anything on the road except a gas station...and OMG you could work on it yourself! This was no sissy euro car...hate to tell you what I drive now ~\..
  • Anthony C  •  10 months ago
    how about the ones normal working people can afford? whats the future for those cars? i make an honest 70k a year but dont want to spend 500$ a month to have fun while i drive.
  • Paul R  •  10 months ago
    My step-dad had a compact sedan made by Datsun in the 60s that got 45 mpg. This has always been possible, yet somehow never happens.
  • Me  •  10 months ago
    If your going to spend that much money on a car your shouldn't worry about how much the mpg......
  • Sean  •  10 months ago
    Damn I don't want the V-8s to leave
  • Rustedcat  •  10 months ago
    I just want to put on my aluminum suit and drive my flying car around the mall.

Follow Yahoo! Autos

RESEARCH A CAR

Top Rated

Category: Sedans

More Articles

  • Most improved cars 2012 Marco R. della Cava

    Total Car Score recently released a list of Most Improved Cars for 2012, highlighting eight redesigned automobiles whose improvements helped the models’ scores jump significantly over 2011.

  • Memorial Day means many things to Americans: An opportunity to remember those who've died in service of their country. A chance to get together with friends and relatives. Cookouts. Picnics. Box socials. (They still have those, right?)

  • Take one look at these purpose-built sports cars and you'd expect them to be fast. You would be wrong. Even before we got used to powerful V6 Camrys, these ten rides chosen by Jalopnik readers were the slowest sports cars the world had ever seen.

  • "High performance" and "fuel efficient" need not be mutually exclusive terms, thanks to some truly quick cars that get surprisingly respectable mileage.

  • One of the most widely accepted bits of advice you’ll find presented in practically every consumer magazine as Wisdom From Upon High is a bad idea.